Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen Max vs Reka Core

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Vérifié par l’équipe de recherche de GetInfoUsDernière révision : October 2026Politique éditoriale
Partager
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Qwen Max vs Reka Core: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Qwen Max by Alibaba and Reka Core by Reka represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Qwen Max holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Qwen Max is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Reka Core provides an expanded memory horizon with 128K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Reka Core leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.

Comparaison Face-à-Face (VS)

Changez et Comparez les Modèles

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen Max

Modèle phare initial

d'Alibaba foundational phare modèle de langage développé pour d'entreprise raisonnement, multilingue traitement, et structuré agents.

Intelligence Index78 / 100
Input Token:

$1.60 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.40 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.5%

Reka

Reka Core

Multimodal

de pointe multimodal modèle de fondation natively traitement texte, élevé-résolution imagery, vidéo clips, et audio inputs.

Intelligence Index77 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil

  • Qwen Max is 2.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Reka Core has a larger context window (128K vs 33K tokens).
  • Reka Core is faster at 75 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaractéristiqueQwen MaxReka Core
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7877
Provider
AlibabaReka
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.60 / 1M$3.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.40 / 1M$15.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.07 / 1M$2.31 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
65 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
32.5%N/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
48%N/A
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.16 / 1M$0.30 / 1M

Qui gagne où ?

At-a-glance decision framework
Code

Evaluations ongoing

Coût
Qwen Max
2.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Vitesse
Reka Core
+15% faster generation
Contexte
Reka Core
128K tokens window

Scores de Benchmarks Vérifiés

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen MaxReka Core
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

32.5%vsN/A
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

48%vsN/A
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78.2%vs75%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1285ptsvs1270pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latence et Temps de Réponse

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen Max0.58s
Reka Core0.58s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen Max8.27s
Reka Core7.25s

Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen Max Monthly API Bill
$8.40 / month
$1.6/1M in · $6.4/1M out
Reka Core Monthly API Bill
$18.45 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
Qwen Max saves approximately $10.05 / month (54%) under this workload.2.2x Savings

Qwen Max · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • exceptionnel chinois et multilingue compréhension à travers Asian langues
  • élevé instruction-following reliability dans d'entreprise API environments
  • solide structuré JSON sortie extraction
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Relatively compact 32K fenêtre de contexte par rapport à newer millions-token releases
  • Superseded par newer Qwen 2.5 et Qwen 3 Max variants pour complexe codage tâches

Reka Core · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • natif omnimodal traitement spanning texte, vidéo, parole, et imagery
  • élevé précision sur multi-frame vidéo scene compréhension et audio transcription
  • conçu par former Google DeepMind, FAIR, et Baidu de pointe AI researchers
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Premium commercial tarification ($3.00 entrée / $15.00 sortie par 1M)
  • Smaller d'entreprise écosystème que major cloud hyper-scalers

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen MaxReka Core
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.18$0.22
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
18K15K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
6K3K

Spécifications Techniques

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaractéristiqueQwen MaxReka Core
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen-max-instructreka-core
API ProtocolAlibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Reka REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2024-042024-04
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2023December 2023
ArchitectureDense Autoregressive Transformer with Multi-Head AttentionMultimodal Foundation Omnimodal Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.6/1M in) across full 33K windowFlat rate ($3/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.16/1M tokensCached input at $0.3/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedReka Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen Max vs Reka Core: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen Max or Reka Core?

Qwen Max is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 77 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Reka Core is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.07 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.31 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has a larger context window?

Reka Core has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.

Verdict

Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Qwen Max if your priority is Multilingual enterprise chat, customer support, and general NLP automation. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Reka Core if your workflow prioritizes Multimodal video search, audio-visual QA, and cross-format media intelligence. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.

Questions fréquentes

How does Qwen Max compare to Reka Core in API token pricing and cost per token?+

Qwen Max costs $1.60 per 1M input tokens and $6.40 per 1M output tokens, whereas Reka Core costs $3.00 input and $15.00 output. Overall, Qwen Max is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.

Which model has a larger context window: Qwen Max or Reka Core?+

Qwen Max supports a context window of 33K tokens (~25k words), while Reka Core supports 128K tokens (~96k words). Therefore, Reka Core can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.

Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Qwen Max or Reka Core?+

Qwen Max scores 32.5% on SWE-bench Verified, while Reka Core scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Qwen Max provides robust code generation and tool calling.

What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Qwen Max and Reka Core?+

Qwen Max features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Reka Core provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.

How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Qwen Max and Reka Core?+

Qwen Max generates approximately 65 tokens per second, while Reka Core delivers 75 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Reka Core provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.

Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Qwen Max and Reka Core to optimize costs?+

Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Qwen Max to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Reka Core. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.

Sources: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs