Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Magistral Medium vs ERNIE 4.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Magistral Medium vs ERNIE 4.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Magistral Medium di Mistral AI e ERNIE 4.5 di Baidu sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Magistral Medium offre una finestra di contesto di 128K token a $1.00/$3.50 per milione di token, mentre ERNIE 4.5 mette a disposizione 128K token di contesto a $0.60/$2.40 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Magistral Medium

Motore di Ragionamento Profondo

Magistral Medium di Mistral AI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, con finestra di contesto da 128K, velocità di 50 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 51/100 e t

Intelligence Index51 / 100
Input Token:

$1.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$3.50 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

45.2%

Baidu

ERNIE 4.5

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

ERNIE 4.5 di Baidu è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 128K, velocità di 75 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 81/100 e

Intelligence Index81 / 100
Input Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.40 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • ERNIE 4.5 is 1.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • ERNIE 4.5 is faster at 75 tok/s vs 50 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMagistral MediumERNIE 4.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5181
Provider
Mistral AIBaidu
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.00 / 1M$0.60 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$3.50 / 1M$2.40 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.72 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
50 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
45.2%N/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
67.8%60%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.06 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
ERNIE 4.5
1.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
ERNIE 4.5
+50% faster generation
Context
Tied
128K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Magistral MediumERNIE 4.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

45.2%vsN/A
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

67.8%vs60%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

82.5%vs78.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1335ptsvs1325pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

40%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

76.5%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

50 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Magistral Medium0.85s
ERNIE 4.50.51s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Magistral Medium10.85s
ERNIE 4.57.18s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Magistral Medium Monthly API Bill
$5.03 / month
$1/1M in · $3.5/1M out
ERNIE 4.5 Monthly API Bill
$3.15 / month
$0.6/1M in · $2.4/1M out
ERNIE 4.5 saves approximately $1.88 / month (37%) under this workload.1.6x Savings

Magistral Medium · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 128K con capacità massima di output fino a 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 45.2% · GPQA Diamond 67.8%)
  • Throughput elevato di 50 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 850 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($1/$3.5 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

ERNIE 4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 128K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (GPQA Diamond 60% · MMLU-Pro 78.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 75 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 510 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($0.6/$2.4 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMagistral MediumERNIE 4.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.65$0.16
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
40K18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
22K4K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMagistral MediumERNIE 4.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)magistral-medium-latesternie-4-5
API ProtocolMistral AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Baidu REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2025-032025-03
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025December 2024
ArchitectureReinforcement-Learned Reasoning TransformerMultimodal Foundation Knowledge Transformer
ParametersConfidential (~70B)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.6/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.25/1M tokensCached input at $0.06/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationMistral AI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedBaidu Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext

Magistral Medium vs ERNIE 4.5: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Magistral Medium or ERNIE 4.5?

ERNIE 4.5 is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 51 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

ERNIE 4.5 is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 50 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

ERNIE 4.5 is cheaper at $0.40 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.72 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

ERNIE 4.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.51s compared with 0.85s.

Verdetto

Sia Magistral Medium (Ideale per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia ERNIE 4.5 (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: ERNIE 4.5 guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, ERNIE 4.5 garantisce una generazione più rapida e ERNIE 4.5 offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Magistral Medium o ERNIE 4.5?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale ERNIE 4.5. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Magistral Medium e ERNIE 4.5?+

Magistral Medium costa $1.00 / $3.50 per milione di token di input/output, mentre ERNIE 4.5 costa $0.60 / $2.40. Nel costo combinato, ERNIE 4.5 risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Magistral Medium supporta 128K token di contesto contro 128K token di ERNIE 4.5, mentre ERNIE 4.5 offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Mistral AI e Baidu, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).