Head-to-Head Model Comparison

o3-pro vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Vérifié par l’équipe de recherche de GetInfoUsDernière révision : October 2026Politique éditoriale
Partager
Related topics (4)
OpenAIAlibabareasoningflagship

Compare o3-pro by OpenAI against Qwen3.8 Max Preview by Alibaba across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparaison Face-à-Face (VS)

Changez et Comparez les Modèles

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

o3-pro

Moteur de Raisonnement Profond

o3-pro de OpenAI est un modèle d’IA conçu pour le raisonnement logique profond, les mathématiques formelles et l’analyse scientifique, offrant une fenêtre de contexte de 200K, une vitesse de 30 tokens/s, un indice d’intelligence de 58/100 e

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$80.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

71.5%

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Modèle de Base à Poids Ouverts

Qwen3.8 Max Preview de Alibaba est un modèle d’IA conçu pour l’auto-hébergement sur infrastructure privée, le fine-tuning et la souveraineté des données, offrant une fenêtre de contexte de 1M, une vitesse de 60 tokens/s, un indice d’intelli

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.2%

Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil

  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview is faster at 60 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (75.2% vs 71.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
Caractéristiqueo3-proQwen3.8 Max Preview
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5893
Provider
OpenAIAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$20.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$80.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$15.50 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
100K32K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
30 tok/s60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
71.5%75.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
79.5%79.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$5.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Qui gagne où ?

At-a-glance decision framework
Code
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
+3.7% SWE-bench lead
Coût
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Vitesse
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
+100% faster generation
Contexte
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
1M tokens window

Scores de Benchmarks Vérifiés

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

o3-proQwen3.8 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

71.5%vs75.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

79.5%vs79.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs89%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1352ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13.6%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

47.5%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

45.5%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs77%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80.5%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

30 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latence et Temps de Réponse

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
o3-pro5.20s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview0.68s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
o3-pro21.87s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview9.01s

Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
o3-pro Monthly API Bill
$109.50 / month
$20/1M in · $80/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview saves approximately $109.50 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

o3-pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Fenêtre de contexte de 200K et capacité de sortie maximale de 100K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 71.5% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Débit rapide de 30 tokens/seconde avec une latence au premier token (TTFT) de 5200 ms
  • Tarification API optimisée ($20/$80 par million de tokens) avec prise en charge du cache de prompts et des schémas JSON stricts
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modèle cloud propriétaire ne permettant pas le téléchargement local des poids sur serveur isolé
  • Pour les charges à très fort volume, l’activation du cache de prompts et de l’API Batch est recommandée

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Fenêtre de contexte de 1M et capacité de sortie maximale de 32K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Débit rapide de 60 tokens/seconde avec une latence au premier token (TTFT) de 680 ms
  • Poids ouverts (2.4T total (95B MoE)) permettant un déploiement sur site ou cloud privé via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Nécessite des serveurs GPU dotés de suffisamment de mémoire VRAM pour l’inférence locale à pleine précision
  • Sur les problèmes de recherche fondamentale très complexes, les modèles de raisonnement lourd restent supérieurs

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metrico3-proQwen3.8 Max Preview
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$11.68$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
58K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
38K15K

Spécifications Techniques

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Caractéristiqueo3-proQwen3.8 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)o3-proqwen3-8-max-preview-instruct
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-062026-07
Knowledge CutoffJune 2024April 2026
ArchitectureHigh-effort reasoning transformerColossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential2.4T total (95B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($20/1M in) across full 200K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

o3-pro vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, o3-pro or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is faster, generating 60 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $15.50 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.68s compared with 5.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Verdict

Choose o3-pro for conçu pour le raisonnement logique profond, les mathématiques formelles et l’analyse scientifique, l’intégration rag et les pipelines de production évolutifs., or choose Qwen3.8 Max Preview for conçu pour l’auto-hébergement sur infrastructure privée, le fine-tuning et la souveraineté des données, l’intégration rag et les pipelines de production évolutifs..

Questions fréquentes

Which is cheaper: o3-pro or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

o3-pro costs $20/1M input and $80/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.8 Max Preview costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: o3-pro or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

o3-pro supports 200K tokens whereas Qwen3.8 Max Preview supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.

Sources: OpenAI & Alibaba Official Documentation