Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Aya Expanse 32B by Cohere and Llama 3.2 90B Vision by Meta represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Llama 3.2 90B Vision holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Llama 3.2 90B Vision is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 128K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Aya Expanse 32B leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Changez et Comparez les Modèles
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Aya Expanse 32B
Multilingue de 32Bélevé-capacité 32B multilingue modèle offrant supérieur performances à travers 23 mondial langues avec rich nuance et 128K contexte.
$0.25 / 1M
$0.50 / 1M
128K tokens
33.5%
Llama 3.2 90B Vision
Modèle phare de vision open sourcede Meta de référence ouvert multimodal modèle de fondation pairing 128K contexte windows avec cross-attention visuel encoders à interpret complexe charts, graphs, et images.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
28.5%
Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil
- Llama 3.2 90B Vision is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Aya Expanse 32B is faster at 85 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
- Aya Expanse 32B leads on SWE-bench coding (33.5% vs 28.5%).
| Caractéristique | Aya Expanse 32B | Llama 3.2 90B Vision |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 44 | 44 |
Provider | Cohere | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.25 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.14 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 75 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 33.5% | 28.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 50% | 48.2% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.06 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Qui gagne où ?
At-a-glance decision frameworkScores de Benchmarks Vérifiés
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latence et Temps de Réponse
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Aya Expanse 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Substantially supérieur raisonnement et factual précision dans non-English langues
- Generous 128K fenêtre de contexte pour long multilingue document traduction
- à poids ouverts sous permissive license pour mondial researchers et enterprises
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Slightly inférieur codage benchmarks que English-centric 32B peers
- nécessite substantiel GPU VRAM pour multitour local hébergement
Llama 3.2 90B Vision · Strengths & Key Advantages
- natif ouvert visuel raisonnement à travers complexe documents, schematics, et maps
- Cross-attention adapter architecture preserves texte raisonnement tandis que unlocking vision
- 128,000 token fenêtre de contexte
Considerations & Trade-offs
- nécessite spécialisé multi-GPU servers pour élevé-débit visuel batching
- sortie génération capped à 8,192 tokens
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Aya Expanse 32B | Llama 3.2 90B Vision |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.18 | $0.20 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 28K | 24K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Spécifications Techniques
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Caractéristique | Aya Expanse 32B | Llama 3.2 90B Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | aya-expanse-32b | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-90B-Vision |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2024-10 | 2024-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 2024 | December 2023 |
| Architecture | High-Capacity Multilingual Transformer | Multimodal Adapter-Fused GQA Transformer |
| Parameters | 32B | 90B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 128K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.06/1M tokens | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 56 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 194 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)
Which model is faster?
Aya Expanse 32B is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 3.2 90B Vision is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.14 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Aya Expanse 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.44s compared with 0.58s.
Verdict
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Aya Expanse 32B if your priority is Global enterprise communications, international legal translation, and academic research. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision if your workflow prioritizes Self-hosted OCR extraction, visual document analysis, and private enterprise multimodal agents. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Questions fréquentes
How does Aya Expanse 32B compare to Llama 3.2 90B Vision in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens, whereas Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.00 input and $0.00 output. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Vision is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Aya Expanse 32B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+
Both Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision offer an identical context window of 128K tokens (~96k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Aya Expanse 32B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+
Aya Expanse 32B scores 33.5% on SWE-bench Verified while Llama 3.2 90B Vision scores 28.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Aya Expanse 32B holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+
Aya Expanse 32B is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, Llama 3.2 90B Vision focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+
Aya Expanse 32B generates approximately 85 tokens per second, while Llama 3.2 90B Vision delivers 75 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Aya Expanse 32B provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Llama 3.2 90B Vision to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Aya Expanse 32B. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Command R7B vs Aya Expanse 32B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 3B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Pixtral Large vs Aya Expanse 32B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.
Sources: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs