Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron VoiceChat vs GPT-6 Astra

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Vérifié par l’équipe de recherche de GetInfoUsDernière révision : October 2026Politique éditoriale
Partager
Related topics (4)
NVIDIAOpenAIflagshipflagship

Compare Nemotron VoiceChat by NVIDIA against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparaison Face-à-Face (VS)

Changez et Comparez les Modèles

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron VoiceChat

Modèle Audio et Vocal Natif

Nemotron VoiceChat de NVIDIA est un modèle d’IA conçu pour la synthèse vocale naturelle, la transcription audio et le dialogue parlé en temps réel, offrant une fenêtre de contexte de 128K, une vitesse de 90 tokens/s, un indice d’intelligenc

Intelligence Index49 / 100
Input Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.50 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

36%

OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra

Modèle Audio et Vocal Natif

GPT-6 Astra de OpenAI est un modèle d’IA conçu pour la synthèse vocale naturelle, la transcription audio et le dialogue parlé en temps réel, offrant une fenêtre de contexte de 272K, une vitesse de 100 tokens/s, un indice d’intelligence de 9

Intelligence Index96 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

272K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.4%

Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil

  • Nemotron VoiceChat is 27.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 128K tokens).
  • GPT-6 Astra is faster at 100 tok/s vs 90 tok/s.
  • GPT-6 Astra leads on SWE-bench coding (82.4% vs 36.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaractéristiqueNemotron VoiceChatGPT-6 Astra
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4996
Provider
NVIDIAOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.50 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.50 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.33 / 1M$7.70 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
90 tok/s100 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
36%82.4%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
52%80.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.12 / 1M$1.00 / 1M

Qui gagne où ?

At-a-glance decision framework
Code
GPT-6 Astra
+46.4% SWE-bench lead
Coût
Nemotron VoiceChat
27.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Vitesse
GPT-6 Astra
+11% faster generation
Contexte
GPT-6 Astra
272K tokens window

Scores de Benchmarks Vérifiés

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron VoiceChatGPT-6 Astra
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

36%vs82.4%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

52%vs80.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1320ptsvs1520pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.2%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs63.8%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs54.9%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs79.8%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs93.6%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs91.2%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

90 tok/s vs100 tok/s

Latence et Temps de Réponse

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron VoiceChat0.22s
GPT-6 Astra0.95s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron VoiceChat5.78s
GPT-6 Astra5.95s

Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron VoiceChat Monthly API Bill
$2.28 / month
$0.5/1M in · $1.5/1M out
GPT-6 Astra Monthly API Bill
$61.50 / month
$10/1M in · $50/1M out
Nemotron VoiceChat saves approximately $59.22 / month (96%) under this workload.27.0x Savings

Nemotron VoiceChat · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Fenêtre de contexte de 128K et capacité de sortie maximale de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 36% · GPQA Diamond 52%)
  • Débit rapide de 90 tokens/seconde avec une latence au premier token (TTFT) de 220 ms
  • Poids ouverts (Confidential (~14B)) permettant un déploiement sur site ou cloud privé via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Nécessite des serveurs GPU dotés de suffisamment de mémoire VRAM pour l’inférence locale à pleine précision
  • Sur les problèmes de recherche fondamentale très complexes, les modèles de raisonnement lourd restent supérieurs

GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Fenêtre de contexte de 272K et capacité de sortie maximale de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 82.4% · GPQA Diamond 80.9%)
  • Débit rapide de 100 tokens/seconde avec une latence au premier token (TTFT) de 950 ms
  • Tarification API optimisée ($10/$50 par million de tokens) avec prise en charge du cache de prompts et des schémas JSON stricts
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modèle cloud propriétaire ne permettant pas le téléchargement local des poids sur serveur isolé
  • Pour les charges à très fort volume, l’activation du cache de prompts et de l’API Batch est recommandée

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron VoiceChatGPT-6 Astra
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.25$2.15
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
20K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K32K

Spécifications Techniques

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaractéristiqueNemotron VoiceChatGPT-6 Astra
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-voicechatgpt-6-astra
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-032026-09
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026June 2026
ArchitectureFull-Duplex Speech-to-Speech TransformerOmni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT
ParametersConfidential (~14B)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.5/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.12/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 9 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 30 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audiotext, vision, audio
Output Modalitiestext, audiotext, audio

Nemotron VoiceChat vs GPT-6 Astra: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron VoiceChat or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 49 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6 Astra is faster, generating 100 tokens per second compared with 90 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nemotron VoiceChat is cheaper at $0.33 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron VoiceChat has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.95s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Verdict

Choose Nemotron VoiceChat for conçu pour la synthèse vocale naturelle, la transcription audio et le dialogue parlé en temps réel, l’intégration rag et les pipelines de production évolutifs., or choose GPT-6 Astra for conçu pour la synthèse vocale naturelle, la transcription audio et le dialogue parlé en temps réel, l’intégration rag et les pipelines de production évolutifs..

Questions fréquentes

Which is cheaper: Nemotron VoiceChat or GPT-6 Astra?+

Nemotron VoiceChat costs $0.5/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Nemotron VoiceChat or GPT-6 Astra?+

Nemotron VoiceChat supports 128K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.

Sources: NVIDIA & OpenAI Official Documentation