GPT Image 2 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare GPT Image 2 by OpenAI against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Changez et Comparez les Modèles
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
GPT Image 2
Image de pointed'OpenAI 2026 image modèle pour prompt-driven génération, editing et design.
$5.00 / 1M
$40.00 / 1M
4.1K tokens
68.5%
Claude Opus 5.5
Titan d'intelligence de pointed'Anthropic pinnacle modèle de pointe conçu pour à long terme agentic ingénierie logicielle, dense multimodal document synthèse, et autonome recherche flux de travail.
$4.00 / 1M
$20.00 / 1M
1M tokens
84.6%
Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil
- Claude Opus 5.5 is 1.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 4K tokens).
- Claude Opus 5.5 is faster at 78 tok/s vs 21 tok/s.
- Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 68.5%).
| Caractéristique | GPT Image 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 59 | 94 |
Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $4.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $40.00 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $5.00 / 1M | $3.08 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 4.1K tokens~6 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 21 tok/s | 78 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 68.5% | 84.6% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 72.5% | 82.3% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.40 / 1M |
Qui gagne où ?
At-a-glance decision frameworkScores de Benchmarks Vérifiés
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latence et Temps de Réponse
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT Image 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- le plus élevé image qualité dans le GPT image line
- Excellent compositional et lighting control
- fiable multitour image editing
- Excellent à accurate dans-image texte et typography
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Premium tarification par generated image
- génération latence still élevé pour interactif design
Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- inégalé autonome multi-étapes codage agentique et refactorisation
- Flawless multidocument raisonnement sur 1M token contexte avec no long-prompt surcharge
- le plus élevé Artificial analyse intelligence Index ever measured (58/100), leading SWE-bench Pro à 89.9%
- Precise outil exécution avec robust error-recovery boucles
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Premium sortie tarification ($20.00/M) plus heavy raisonnement-token usage (~119K sortie tokens par index tâche) keeps long agentic fonctionne expensive
- long pensée times à maximum effort peut push un unique hard agentic tâche toward ~$13
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT Image 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.36 | $3.85 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 9K | 68K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 42K |
Spécifications Techniques
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Caractéristique | GPT Image 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-image-2 | claude-opus-5-5-20260901 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | March 2026 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Frontier native multimodal image transformer | Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($5/1M in) across full 4K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | $0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | image | text |
GPT Image 2 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GPT Image 2 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 59 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Claude Opus 5.5 is faster, generating 78 tokens per second compared with 21 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper at $3.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $5.00 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude Opus 5.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.40s compared with 6.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 4.1K tokens.
Verdict
Choose GPT Image 2 for élevé-end visuel production et campaign assets, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for grand-échelle logiciel development agents, d'entreprise codebases, et mission critique scientifique synthèse.
Questions fréquentes
Which is cheaper: GPT Image 2 or Claude Opus 5.5?+
GPT Image 2 costs $5/1M input and $40/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT Image 2 or Claude Opus 5.5?+
GPT Image 2 supports 4K tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.
Sources: OpenAI & Anthropic Official Documentation