Gemini 2.5 Computer Use vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Gemini 2.5 Computer Use by Google against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Changez et Comparez les Modèles
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
Agent de navigateurspécialisé Gemini variant développé pour browser navigation, GUI interactions, et desktop automatisation.
$1.50 / 1M
$8.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Gemini 4 Argon
Roi multimodal avec sortie 1MGoogle de DeepMind phare de pointe raisonnement moteur intégrant 1-millions-token sortie limits, autonome cybersecurity defense, et en temps réel audio/vision ingestion.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
- Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
| Caractéristique | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 65 | 97 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.50 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $8.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.36 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.38 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Qui gagne où ?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Scores de Benchmarks Vérifiés
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latence et Temps de Réponse
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use · Strengths & Key Advantages
- élevé précision UI coordinates et element ancrage
- autonome multi-étapes browser flux de travail
- spécialisé action error recovery
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Restricted 128K fenêtre de contexte
- supérieur inférence latence during screen parsing boucles
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Groundbreaking 1,000,000 token maximum sortie génération capacité via long Decode Continuation
- 1M-token entrée window avec 99.7% GraphWalks recall (84.2% dans le 256K-1M range)
- natif traitement de complet audio, vidéo streams, et visuel données (91.7% sur LVBench)
- Half le token prix de d'Anthropic Opus 5.5 et #1 sur Chatbot Arena (1525 Elo)
Considerations & Trade-offs
- massif token outputs peut incur élevé absolute coûts if unconstrained (~62K sortie tokens par index tâche)
- $2/$10 tarification est un introductory 50% discount; standard rates revert à $4/$20 once le promotion ends
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.15 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 6K | 36K |
Spécifications Techniques
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Caractéristique | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-2-5-computer-use | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2025-10 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Action-grounded vision-language agent model | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 128K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.375/1M with configurable TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use vs Gemini 4 Argon: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use is cheaper at $1.36 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.65s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Verdict
Choose Gemini 2.5 Computer Use for autonome web scraping, qa test automatisation, et rpa desktop flux de travail, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for whole-dépôt génération de code, complet-book synthèse, vidéo compréhension, et multi-hour audio traitement.
Questions fréquentes
Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use costs $1.5/1M input and $8/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use supports 128K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.
Sources: Google & Google Official Documentation