Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet by Anthropic and Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Claude 3.5 Sonnet holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 200K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
플래그십 프론티어 모델Anthropic의 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 모델은 200K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $3/1M 토큰, 출력 $15/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.
$3.00 / 1M
$15.00 / 1M
200K tokens
65%
Claude 3 Opus
플래그십 프론티어 모델Anthropic의 Claude 3 Opus 모델은 200K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $15/1M 토큰, 출력 $75/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.
$15.00 / 1M
$75.00 / 1M
200K tokens
32.2%
한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 5.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet is faster at 80 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads on SWE-bench coding (65.0% vs 32.2%).
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 50 | 44 |
Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $3.00 / 1M | $15.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $15.00 / 1M | $75.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $2.31 / 1M | $11.55 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 80 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 65% | 32.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 59.4% | 50.4% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.30 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M |
부문별 우위 모델
At-a-glance decision framework검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Anthropic의 첨단 Next-Gen Multimodal Hybrid Transformer 아키텍처와 최대 200K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
- 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $3/1M, 출력 $15/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
- 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
- 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨
Claude 3 Opus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Anthropic의 첨단 Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer 아키텍처와 최대 200K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
- 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $15/1M, 출력 $75/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
- 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
- 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.20 | $0.20 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 24K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
기술 사양 (Specifications)
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-3-5-sonnet-20240601 | claude-3-opus-20240301 |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2024-06 | 2024-03 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | April 2024 | August 2023 |
| Architecture | Next-Gen Multimodal Hybrid Transformer | Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $0.3/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | $1.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 3 Opus?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more intelligent. It scores 50 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is faster, generating 80 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is cheaper at $2.31 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $11.55 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 1.20s.
종합 평가
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if your priority is Complex multi-file software engineering, developer agents, visual UI prototyping, and autonomous computer use. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Claude 3 Opus if your workflow prioritizes Executive strategy briefs, high-end creative writing, philosophical research, and nuanced legal evaluation. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)
How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Claude 3 Opus in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 3 Opus?+
Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus offer an identical context window of 200K tokens (~150k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 3 Opus?+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 65% on SWE-bench Verified while Claude 3 Opus scores 32.2%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Claude 3.5 Sonnet holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus?+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, Claude 3 Opus focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus?+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet generates approximately 80 tokens per second, while Claude 3 Opus delivers 30 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Claude 3.5 Sonnet provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Claude 3.5 Sonnet to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Claude 3 Opus. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3 Opus: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Qwen-VL Plus vs Claude 3 Opus: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison비교
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
공식 출처: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs