Veo 3.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Veo 3.1 by Google against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Veo 3.1
Edición de videoAdvanced video generación motor que ofrece timeline-level motion editing, re-lighting, y camera trajectory control.
$7.00 / 1M
$450.00 / 1M
4.1K tokens
N/A
Gemini 4 Argon
Rey multimodal con salida de 1MGoogle de DeepMind insignia de frontera razonamiento motor con 1-millones-token salida limits, autónomo cybersecurity defense, y en tiempo real audio/visión ingesta.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Gemini 4 Argon is 34.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 4K tokens).
- Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 14 tok/s.
| Característica | Veo 3.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 88 | 97 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $7.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $450.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $46.40 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 4.1K tokens~6 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 14 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Veo 3.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Keyframe-directed video editing y inpainting
- Manipulación sofisticada de iluminación dinámica
- Enhanced multi-character temporal coherencia
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Gasto computacional costoso
- complejo API controls require prompt engineering
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Groundbreaking 1,000,000 token maximum salida generación capacidad via largo Decode Continuation
- 1M-token entrada window con 99.7% GraphWalks recall (84.2% en el 256K-1M range)
- nativo procesamiento de completo audio, video streams, y visual datos (91.7% en LVBench)
- Half el token precio de de Anthropic Opus 5.5 y #1 en Chatbot Arena (1525 Elo)
Considerations & Trade-offs
- masivo token outputs puede incur alto absolute costos if unconstrained (~62K salida tokens por index tarea)
- $2/$10 precios es un introductory 50% discount; estándar rates revert un $4/$20 once el promotion ends
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $3.00 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 0K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 36K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Veo 3.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/veo-3-1 | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2025-10 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | July 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Controllable audio-video generation and in-context video editor | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($7/1M in) across full 4K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0/1M with configurable TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | video | text |
Veo 3.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Veo 3.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 88 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 14 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $46.40 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 4 Argon has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 4.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 4.1K tokens.
Veredicto
Choose Veo 3.1 for vfx post-producción, film editing flujos de trabajo, y alto-end video advertising, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for whole-repositorio generación de código, completo-book síntesis, video comprensión, y multi-hour audio procesamiento.
Preguntas frecuentes
Which is cheaper: Veo 3.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Veo 3.1 costs $7/1M input and $450/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Veo 3.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Veo 3.1 supports 4K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: Google & Google Official Documentation