Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 72B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct de Alibaba y Qwen 2.5 72B de Alibaba compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct ofrece una ventana de contexto de 131.1K tokens a $0.00/$0.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Qwen 2.5 72B ofrece 128K tokens de contexto a $0.35/$0.70 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Modelo Base de Pesos AbiertosQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct de Alibaba es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 131K, velocidad de 135 tokens/s, índice de inteligenci
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Qwen 2.5 72B
Modelo Base de Pesos AbiertosQwen 2.5 72B de Alibaba es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 128K, velocidad de 64 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 44/100 y ta
$0.35 / 1M
$0.70 / 1M
128K tokens
45.2%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is faster at 135 tok/s vs 64 tok/s.
| Característica | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Qwen 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 78 | 44 |
Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.35 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.70 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.19 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 135 tok/s | 64 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 45.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 60% | 52.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Ventana de contexto de 131K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (GPQA Diamond 60% · MMLU-Pro 78%)
- Rendimiento ágil de 135 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 310 ms
- Pesos abiertos (80B total (3B MoE)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
- En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad
Qwen 2.5 72B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Ventana de contexto de 128K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 45.2% · GPQA Diamond 52.8%)
- Rendimiento ágil de 64 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 610 ms
- Pesos abiertos (72B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
- En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Qwen 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.28 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 32K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Qwen 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct-instruct | qwen-2-5-72b-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-09 | 2024-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 2025 | September 2024 |
| Architecture | Standard Instruction-Tuned Sparse Mixture-of-Experts | Dense Autoregressive Transformer |
| Parameters | 80B total (3B active MoE) | 72B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Cached input at $0.07/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 50 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 172 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 45 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 155 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 72B: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Qwen 2.5 72B?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is faster, generating 135 tokens per second compared with 64 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.19 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.31s compared with 0.61s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Veredicto
Tanto Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Qwen 2.5 72B (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct o Qwen 2.5 72B?+
En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.
¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct frente a Qwen 2.5 72B?+
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct cuesta $0.00 / $0.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Qwen 2.5 72B cuesta $0.35 / $0.70. En costo combinado, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct es la opción más económica.
¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct cuenta con 131.1K tokens de contexto frente a 128K tokens de Qwen 2.5 72B. En velocidad de inferencia, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct ofrece un rendimiento superior.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Llama 3.2 3B vs. Qwen 2.5 72B: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Qwen 2.5 72B vs. Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Qwen3.5 27B vs. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs. Llama 4 Scout: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Aion-3.0 vs. Aion-Mini: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Aion-3.0 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Alibaba y Alibaba, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).