Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct by Alibaba and Llama 4 Scout by Meta represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, costs are matched. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Llama 4 Scout provides an expanded memory horizon with 3,500K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Instruct eficientealto-velocidad instrucción-following MoE motor ofreciendo rápido, direct conversacional answers sin verbose internal pensamiento chains.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Llama 4 Scout
Rey del contexto de 10Mmundo-record de contexto largo abierto modelo supporting ~3.5 millones tokens para completo codebase y video library ingesta.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
3.5M tokens
N/A
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window (4M vs 131K tokens).
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is faster at 135 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
| Característica | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 78 | 76 |
Provider | Alibaba | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 3.5M tokens~5,250 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 33K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 135 tok/s | 95 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 60% | N/A |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Immediate, concise answers sin latencia-inducing cadena de pensamiento overhead
- se ejecuta un blazing speeds en estándar multi-GPU o quantized desktop setups
- confiable JSON formateo y herramienta invocation
Considerations & Trade-offs
- menor ceiling en Olympiad matemáticas y hard lógica puzzles en comparación con el pensamiento variant
- ventana de contexto limitado un 131K tokens
Llama 4 Scout · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Colossal 3.5 millones token ventana de contexto
- Sparse MoE arquitectura keeps activo compute un solo 17B
- de pesos abiertos available para local implementación
Considerations & Trade-offs
- requiere alto unified memoria un store el completo 109B weights
- Secondary razonamiento profundidad en comparación con denso razonamiento modelos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 10K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct-instruct | meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-09 | 2025-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 2025 | January 2025 |
| Architecture | Standard Instruction-Tuned Sparse Mixture-of-Experts | Extreme-context sparse MoE multimodal transformer (17B active / 109B total) |
| Parameters | 80B total (3B active MoE) | 17B (109B total MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 50 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 172 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 11 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 37 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 76 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is faster, generating 135 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.31s compared with 0.65s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 4 Scout has a larger context window, supporting 3.5M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.
Veredicto
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct if your priority is General conversational agents, customer care, and low-latency API wrappers. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Llama 4 Scout if your workflow prioritizes Whole-repository code analysis, multi-hour video understanding, and legal book ingestion. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Preguntas frecuentes
How does Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct compare to Llama 4 Scout in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Both Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout are open-weights foundation models available at $0.00 direct API cost when self-hosted, or offered at identical baseline rates across major inference providers. Model selection depends on GPU deployment sizing and specialized benchmark performance rather than raw token price.
Which model has a larger context window: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?+
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct supports a context window of 131K tokens (~98k words), while Llama 4 Scout supports 3,500K tokens (~2,625k words). Therefore, Llama 4 Scout can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?+
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout?+
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, Llama 4 Scout focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout?+
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct generates approximately 135 tokens per second, while Llama 4 Scout delivers 95 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout to optimize costs?+
Yes! Tiered multi-model routing can optimize for latency and accuracy: you can route high-frequency conversational turns and latency-sensitive queries to Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, and route deep architectural or complex reasoning queries to Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct. This balanced routing strategy maximizes system throughput and answer quality.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemma 3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 72B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs