Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mixtral 8x22B de Mistral AI y Mixtral 8x7B de Mistral AI compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Mixtral 8x22B ofrece una ventana de contexto de 65.5K tokens a $1.20/$1.20 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Mixtral 8x7B ofrece 32.8K tokens de contexto a $0.20/$0.20 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x22B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Mixtral 8x22B de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 66K, velocidad de 55 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 44/100 y

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

65.5K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

36%

Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x7B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Mixtral 8x7B de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 33K, velocidad de 130 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 37/100 y

Intelligence Index37 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Mixtral 8x7B is 6.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mixtral 8x22B has a larger context window (66K vs 33K tokens).
  • Mixtral 8x7B is faster at 130 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaMixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4437
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.20 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.20 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.78 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
65.5K tokens~98 A4 pages of text32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
55 tok/s130 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
36%N/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
51.2%38%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.60 / 1M$0.05 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código

Evaluations ongoing

Costo
Mixtral 8x7B
6.8x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Mixtral 8x7B
+136% faster generation
Contexto
Mixtral 8x22B
65.5K tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

36%vsN/A
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

51.2%vs38%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs66.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1260ptsvs1195pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

31%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

62%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs130 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mixtral 8x22B0.70s
Mixtral 8x7B0.38s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mixtral 8x22B9.79s
Mixtral 8x7B4.23s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mixtral 8x22B Monthly API Bill
$3.78 / month
$1.2/1M in · $1.2/1M out
Mixtral 8x7B Monthly API Bill
$0.56 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.2/1M out
Mixtral 8x7B saves approximately $3.22 / month (85%) under this workload.6.8x Savings

Mixtral 8x22B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 66K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 36% · GPQA Diamond 51.2%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 55 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 700 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (141B total (39B MoE)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Mixtral 8x7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 33K con hasta 4K tokens de salida máxima (GPQA Diamond 38% · MMLU-Pro 66.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 130 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 380 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (46.7B (12.9B )) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.45$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaMixtral 8x22BMixtral 8x7B
Official API Model ID (SDK)mixtral-8x22b-latestmixtral-8x7b-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-042023-12
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2024Late 2023
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (8x22B)Sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE, 2 active of 8)
Parameters141B total (39B active MoE)46.7B (12.9B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.2/1M in) across full 66K windowFlat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 33K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.6/1M tokensCached input at $0.05/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 303 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 29 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 100 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mixtral 8x22B vs Mixtral 8x7B: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mixtral 8x22B or Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x22B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 37 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mixtral 8x7B is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.10 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.78 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mixtral 8x7B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.70s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mixtral 8x22B has a larger context window, supporting 65.5K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Mixtral 8x22B (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Mixtral 8x7B (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Mixtral 8x22B lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Mixtral 8x7B ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Mixtral 8x7B resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Mixtral 8x22B o Mixtral 8x7B?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Mixtral 8x22B obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Mixtral 8x22B frente a Mixtral 8x7B?+

Mixtral 8x22B cuesta $1.20 / $1.20 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Mixtral 8x7B cuesta $0.20 / $0.20. En costo combinado, Mixtral 8x7B es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Mixtral 8x22B cuenta con 65.5K tokens de contexto frente a 32.8K tokens de Mixtral 8x7B. En velocidad de inferencia, Mixtral 8x7B ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Mistral AI y Mistral AI, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).