Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mistral Medium 3 de Mistral AI y Mistral Small 3 de Mistral AI compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Mistral Medium 3 ofrece una ventana de contexto de 131.1K tokens a $0.40/$2.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Mistral Small 3 ofrece 32K tokens de contexto a $0.10/$0.30 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Mistral Medium 3 de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 131K, velocidad de 85 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 47/1

Intelligence Index47 / 100
Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

40.5%

Mistral AI

Mistral Small 3

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Mistral Small 3 de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 32K, velocidad de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 41/10

Intelligence Index41 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

32K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

31.5%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Mistral Small 3 is 5.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mistral Medium 3 has a larger context window (131K vs 32K tokens).
  • Mistral Small 3 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
  • Mistral Medium 3 leads on SWE-bench coding (40.5% vs 31.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaMistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4741
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.40 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.35 / 1M$0.09 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text32K tokens~48 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
85 tok/s105 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
40.5%31.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
57.5%46.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.05 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Mistral Medium 3
+9.0% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Mistral Small 3
5.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Mistral Small 3
+24% faster generation
Contexto
Mistral Medium 3
131.1K tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

40.5%vs31.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

57.5%vs46.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

79.5%vs70.2%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1310ptsvs1238pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

36%vs27%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

68%vs52%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

77%vs64%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

85 tok/s vs105 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mistral Medium 30.48s
Mistral Small 30.38s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mistral Medium 36.36s
Mistral Small 35.14s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mistral Medium 3 Monthly API Bill
$2.55 / month
$0.4/1M in · $2/1M out
Mistral Small 3 Monthly API Bill
$0.50 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.3/1M out
Mistral Small 3 saves approximately $2.06 / month (81%) under this workload.5.2x Savings

Mistral Medium 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 131K con hasta 16K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 40.5% · GPQA Diamond 57.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 85 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 480 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (Confidential (~70B)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Mistral Small 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 32K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 31.5% · GPQA Diamond 46.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 105 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 380 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (24B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.35$0.08
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K25K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaMistral Medium 3Mistral Small 3
Official API Model ID (SDK)mistral-medium-3-latestmistral-small-3-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-052025-01
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2025December 2024
ArchitectureEnterprise Multimodal TransformerCompact Dense Transformer
ParametersConfidential (~70B)24B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.4/1M in) across full 131K windowFlat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 32K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.1/1M tokensCached input at $0.05/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Medium 3 is more intelligent. It scores 47 compared with 41 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mistral Small 3 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Small 3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mistral Medium 3 has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 32K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Mistral Medium 3 (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Mistral Small 3 (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Mistral Medium 3 lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Mistral Small 3 ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Mistral Small 3 resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Mistral Medium 3 o Mistral Small 3?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Mistral Medium 3 obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Mistral Medium 3 frente a Mistral Small 3?+

Mistral Medium 3 cuesta $0.40 / $2.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Mistral Small 3 cuesta $0.10 / $0.30. En costo combinado, Mistral Small 3 es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Mistral Medium 3 cuenta con 131.1K tokens de contexto frente a 32K tokens de Mistral Small 3. En velocidad de inferencia, Mistral Small 3 ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Mistral AI y Mistral AI, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).