Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructProfile

Mistral Medium 3Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

NVIDIA

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct de NVIDIA es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 128K, velocidad de 80 tokens/s, índice de inteligen

Intelligence Index47 / 100

Input Token:

$0.35 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.70 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

41.2%

Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Mistral Medium 3 de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 131K, velocidad de 85 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 47/1

Intelligence Index47 / 100

Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

40.5%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 2.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Mistral Medium 3 has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
Mistral Medium 3 is faster at 85 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads on SWE-bench coding (41.2% vs 40.5%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Característica	Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct	Mistral Medium 3
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	47	47
Provider	NVIDIA	Mistral AI
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.35 / 1M	$0.40 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.70 / 1M	$2.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.21 / 1M	$0.35 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	80 tok/s	85 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	41.2%	40.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	58.5%	57.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.10 / 1M	$0.10 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework

Código

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

+0.7% SWE-bench lead

Costo

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

2.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Velocidad

Mistral Medium 3

+6% faster generation

Contexto

Mistral Medium 3

131.1K tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructMistral Medium 3

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

41.2%vs40.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

58.5%vs57.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

79.2%vs79.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1318ptsvs1310pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38%vs36%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

68%vs68%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

75%vs77%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

80 tok/s vs85 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct0.45s

Mistral Medium 30.48s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct6.70s

Mistral Medium 36.36s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Monthly API Bill

$1.30 / month

$0.35/1M in · $0.7/1M out

Mistral Medium 3 Monthly API Bill

$2.55 / month

$0.4/1M in · $2/1M out

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct saves approximately $1.25 / month (49%) under this workload.2.0x Savings

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

Ventana de contexto de 128K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 41.2% · GPQA Diamond 58.5%)
Rendimiento ágil de 80 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 450 ms
Pesos abiertos (70B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Mistral Medium 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Ventana de contexto de 131K con hasta 16K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 40.5% · GPQA Diamond 57.5%)
Rendimiento ágil de 85 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 480 ms
Pesos abiertos (Confidential (~70B)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct	Mistral Medium 3
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.28	$0.35
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	32K	35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Característica	Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct	Mistral Medium 3
Official API Model ID (SDK)	llama-3-1-nemotron-70b	mistral-medium-3-latest
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2025-04	2025-05
Knowledge Cutoff	December 2024	March 2025
Architecture	RLHF Aligned Llama 3.1 Derivative	Enterprise Multimodal Transformer
Parameters	70B	Confidential (~70B)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 128K window	Flat rate ($0.4/1M in) across full 131K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.1/1M tokens	Cached input at $0.1/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which model is faster?

Mistral Medium 3 is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is cheaper at $0.21 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.45s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mistral Medium 3 has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Mistral Medium 3 (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Mistral Medium 3 ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct o Mistral Medium 3?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct frente a Mistral Medium 3?+

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct cuesta $0.35 / $0.70 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Mistral Medium 3 cuesta $0.40 / $2.00. En costo combinado, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct cuenta con 128K tokens de contexto frente a 131.1K tokens de Mistral Medium 3. En velocidad de inferencia, Mistral Medium 3 ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Mistral Medium 3

¿Quién gana en cada área?

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Mistral Medium 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificaciones Técnicas

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredicto

Preguntas frecuentes

Related reading