Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (4)
AI21Googleopen-sourceflagship

Compare Jamba 1.5 Mini by AI21 against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
AI21

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Inferencia Ultrarrápida

Jamba 1.5 Mini de AI21 es un modelo de IA diseñado para interacción en tiempo real, baja latencia y enrutamiento de alto volumen, con ventana de contexto de 256K, velocidad de 120 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 39/100 y tarifa de $0.2/

Intelligence Index39 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

35.8%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodal Nativa

Gemini 4 Argon de Google es un modelo de IA diseñado para comprensión multimodal nativa de texto e imagen y análisis visual de documentos, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 97/100 y tarifa d

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Jamba 1.5 Mini is 16.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
  • Jamba 1.5 Mini is faster at 120 tok/s vs 115 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 35.8%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaJamba 1.5 MiniGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3997
Provider
AI21Google
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.40 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.11 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
4K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
120 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
35.8%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
44.2%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Gemini 4 Argon
+46.1% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Jamba 1.5 Mini
16.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Jamba 1.5 Mini
+4% faster generation
Contexto
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Jamba 1.5 MiniGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

35.8%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

44.2%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

64%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1242ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

4.8%vs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

21.5%vs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

22.8%vs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

37.5%vs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

45%vs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

72%vs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

120 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Jamba 1.5 Mini0.34s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Jamba 1.5 Mini4.51s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Jamba 1.5 Mini Monthly API Bill
$0.74 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.4/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Jamba 1.5 Mini saves approximately $11.42 / month (94%) under this workload.16.5x Savings

Jamba 1.5 Mini · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 256K con hasta 4K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 35.8% · GPQA Diamond 44.2%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 120 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 340 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (52B (12B )) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 1M tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 115 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 850 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricJamba 1.5 MiniGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.12$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
20K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K36K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaJamba 1.5 MiniGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)jamba-1-5-minimodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2024-082026-09
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2024June 2026
ArchitectureHybrid SSM-Transformer (Mamba + Transformer MoE)Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters52B (12B active)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 256K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokensImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 32 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 112 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Jamba 1.5 Mini vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Jamba 1.5 Mini or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 39 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Jamba 1.5 Mini is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 115 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Jamba 1.5 Mini is cheaper at $0.11 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Jamba 1.5 Mini has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.34s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.

Veredicto

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini for ideal para interacción en tiempo real, baja latencia y enrutamiento de alto volumen, sistemas rag empresariales y automatización mediante api., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for ideal para comprensión multimodal nativa de texto e imagen y análisis visual de documentos, sistemas rag empresariales y automatización mediante api..

Preguntas frecuentes

Which is cheaper: Jamba 1.5 Mini or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Jamba 1.5 Mini costs $0.2/1M input and $0.4/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Jamba 1.5 Mini or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Jamba 1.5 Mini supports 256K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: AI21 & Google Official Documentation