Hy3 vs Hy3 preview
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Hy3 by Tencent and Hy3 preview by Tencent represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, costs are matched. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 262K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Hy3 preview leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Hy3
Razonador económicode Tencent de pesos abiertos Hy modelo de razonamiento desarrollado para económico codificación, estructurado herramienta ejecución, y en-premises empresarial cargas de trabajo.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
N/A
Hy3 preview
Vista previaEarly preview lanzamiento del Hy3 razonamiento arquitectura allowing desarrolladores un test next-generación instrucción following y herramienta bucles.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
N/A
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Hy3 preview is faster at 88 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
| Característica | Hy3 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 81 | 79 |
Provider | Tencent | Tencent |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 88 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 64% | N/A |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Hy3 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Solid 262K ventana de contexto con de pesos abiertos para local privacy
- Fuerte seguimiento de instrucciones y confiable JSON function calling
- Reasonable hardware huella deployable en estándar dual-GPU setups
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Slightly behind de frontera modelos en difficult Olympiad-level mathematics
- menos community ecosistema documentation outside de China
Hy3 preview · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Early access un Tencent updated MoE razonamiento arquitectura
- Free de pesos abiertos testing para empresarial evaluación
- bueno baseline rendimiento un través de chino y English tareas
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Preview build con occasional experimental perimetral-case variations
- Superseded por el final producción Hy3 lanzamiento
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Hy3 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 18K | 15K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 5K | 3K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Hy3 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | hy3 | hy3-preview |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-07 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | April 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Efficient Open Reasoning MoE Transformer | Preview Open Reasoning MoE Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential / 140B MoE | Confidential / 140B MoE |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 301 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 301 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Hy3 vs Hy3 preview: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Hy3 or Hy3 preview?
Hy3 is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 79 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Hy3 preview is faster, generating 88 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Hy3 preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.44s compared with 0.46s.
Veredicto
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Hy3 if your priority is Private enterprise coding assistants, automated workflow agents, and internal data analysis. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Hy3 preview if your workflow prioritizes Early benchmarking, architectural evaluation, and experimental agent testing. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Preguntas frecuentes
How does Hy3 compare to Hy3 preview in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Both Hy3 and Hy3 preview are open-weights foundation models available at $0.00 direct API cost when self-hosted, or offered at identical baseline rates across major inference providers. Model selection depends on GPU deployment sizing and specialized benchmark performance rather than raw token price.
Which model has a larger context window: Hy3 or Hy3 preview?+
Both Hy3 and Hy3 preview offer an identical context window of 262K tokens (~197k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Hy3 or Hy3 preview?+
Hy3 scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Hy3 preview scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Hy3 provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Hy3 and Hy3 preview?+
Hy3 features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Hy3 preview provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Hy3 and Hy3 preview?+
Hy3 generates approximately 85 tokens per second, while Hy3 preview delivers 88 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Hy3 preview provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Hy3 and Hy3 preview to optimize costs?+
Yes! Tiered multi-model routing can optimize for latency and accuracy: you can route high-frequency conversational turns and latency-sensitive queries to Hy3 preview, and route deep architectural or complex reasoning queries to Hy3. This balanced routing strategy maximizes system throughput and answer quality.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemma 4 E4B vs Hy3 preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Hy3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs