Grok 4.7 vs Llama 5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Grok 4.7 by xAI against Llama 5 by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Grok 4.7
Mejora al mismo precio2.1 billones parámetro potencia con four-nivel adjustable razonamiento, superior legal agente scores, y unchanged $2/$6 precios.
$2.00 / 1M
$6.00 / 1M
500K tokens
77.2%
Llama 5
Automejora recursivade Meta insignia abierto modelo con nativo agente training, recursive self-improvement, y 5M token contexto.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
5M tokens
74%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 500K tokens).
- Grok 4.7 is faster at 110 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
- Grok 4.7 leads on SWE-bench coding (77.2% vs 74.0%).
| Característica | Grok 4.7 | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 46 | 94 |
Provider | xAI | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $2.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $6.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.35 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 500K tokens~750 A4 pages of text | 5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 66K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 110 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 77.2% | 74% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 78.5% | 84% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPuntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Grok 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- masivo 2.1T MoE parámetro escala con unchanged base precios ($2 en / $6 out por 1M)
- 4-level razonamiento effort control con superior legal agente score (Harvey legal 19.6%)
- alto biology y científico síntesis rendimiento (LatchBio 62.4%)
- sólido official CursorBench (46.3) y Terminal-Bench (38.0) rendimiento
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Independent pruebas de rendimiento show menor scores que official claims (Terminal-Bench ~26% vs 38%)
- de contexto largo queries (>=200K) double el effective API precios ($4 en / $12 out) un través del entire request
- multimodal imagen razonamiento remains somewhat weaker que competing visión flagships
Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 5 millones token contexto con nativo multi-audio/video comprensión
- Bucle de entrenamiento de automejora recursiva
- Completely de pesos abiertos con empresarial comercial license
Considerations & Trade-offs
- complejo MoE servicio requirements
- Los cambios del tokenizador de 4B requieren actualizar entornos de ajuste heredados
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.68 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 46K | 40K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 23K | 20K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Grok 4.7 | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | grok-4-7-latest | meta-llama/Llama-5 |
| API Protocol | xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-09 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | April 2026 | January 2026 |
| Architecture | 2.1T Multimodal Sparse MoE | Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) |
| Parameters | 2.1T (MoE) | 600B+ total (~40-80B active) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 500K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.5/1M tokens | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Real-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | xAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, video, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Grok 4.7 vs Llama 5: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.7 or Llama 5?
Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Grok 4.7 is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Grok 4.7 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 500K tokens.
Veredicto
Choose Grok 4.7 for económico second opinions en codificación y legal flujos de trabajo, empresarial domain tareas, y equilibrado agentic automatización, or choose Llama 5 for autónomo de código abierto multi-agente systems, profundo software refactorización, y de frontera investigación.
Preguntas frecuentes
Which is cheaper: Grok 4.7 or Llama 5?+
Grok 4.7 costs $2/1M input and $6/1M output tokens, while Llama 5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Grok 4.7 or Llama 5?+
Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens whereas Llama 5 supports 5M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: xAI & Meta Official Documentation