GPT-OSS 120B vs Llama 4 Behemoth
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare GPT-OSS 120B by OpenAI against Llama 4 Behemoth by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
GPT-OSS 120B
Peso pesado abiertoun heavyweight abierto-weight GPT modelo de razonamiento que se ejecuta en un único GPU.
$0.15 / 1M
$0.60 / 1M
131.1K tokens
45.5%
Llama 4 Behemoth
Gigante abierto de 2Tde Meta gargantuan 2-billones parámetro abierto modelo pushing el de frontera de abierto-weight capacidad y 10M contexto.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
10M tokens
75%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Llama 4 Behemoth is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window (10M vs 131K tokens).
- GPT-OSS 120B is faster at 95 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.
- Llama 4 Behemoth leads on SWE-bench coding (75.0% vs 45.5%).
| Característica | GPT-OSS 120B | Llama 4 Behemoth |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 56 | 93 |
Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.15 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.60 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.10 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 10M tokens~15,000 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 64K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 95 tok/s | 45 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 45.5% | 75% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 68.5% | 82% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPuntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-OSS 120B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- o4-mini-clase rendimiento con fully de pesos abiertos
- se ejecuta en un único alto-memoria GPU thanks un MoE enrutamiento
- sólido llamada un herramientas para autohospedado agentes
- Near-o4-mini calidad en privado infraestructura
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Still behind propietario de frontera modelos en razonamiento
- texto-solo modality soporte
- requiere serious GPU memoria un self-host
Llama 4 Behemoth · Strengths & Key Advantages
- sin rival 2T parámetro abierto capacidad
- Staggering ~10 millones token contexto horizon
- de vanguardia codificación y razonamiento scores
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Demands alto-end datacenter multinodo GPU clústeres (8x H100 minimum)
- Slow inferencia rendimiento en comparación con smaller modelos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-OSS 120B | Llama 4 Behemoth |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.14 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 35K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 22K | 15K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | GPT-OSS 120B | Llama 4 Behemoth |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-oss-120b | meta-llama/Llama-4-Behemoth |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-08 | 2026-05 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2024 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Sparse MoE transformer with reasoning | Colossal sparse MoE architecture (288B active / 2T total, 16-of-2 MoE) |
| Parameters | 117B (5.1B active MoE) | 2T total / 288B active (16-of-2 MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 131K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.015/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 73 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 252 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1240 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4300 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GPT-OSS 120B vs Llama 4 Behemoth: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-OSS 120B or Llama 4 Behemoth?
Llama 4 Behemoth is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 56 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-OSS 120B is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 4 Behemoth is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.10 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-OSS 120B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 1.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window, supporting 10M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.
Veredicto
Choose GPT-OSS 120B for autohospedado agentes que need near-de frontera calidad en privado datos, or choose Llama 4 Behemoth for national laboratories, grande empresarial ai clústeres, y extreme científico modeling.
Preguntas frecuentes
Which is cheaper: GPT-OSS 120B or Llama 4 Behemoth?+
GPT-OSS 120B costs $0.15/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Behemoth costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-OSS 120B or Llama 4 Behemoth?+
GPT-OSS 120B supports 131K tokens whereas Llama 4 Behemoth supports 10M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: OpenAI & Meta Official Documentation