Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.5 Instant

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.5 Instant: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna de OpenAI y GPT-5.5 Instant de OpenAI compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. GPT-5.6 Luna ofrece una ventana de contexto de 1.05M tokens a $0.20/$1.20 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que GPT-5.5 Instant ofrece 400K tokens de contexto a $0.75/$6.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Modelo Ligero y Económico

GPT-5.6 Luna de OpenAI es un modelo de IA diseñado para máxima eficiencia de costos por token y alta velocidad en producción, con ventana de contexto de 1.1M, velocidad de 230 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 57/100 y tarifa de $0.2/$1.2

Intelligence Index57 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

63.5%

OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant

Modelo Ligero y Económico

GPT-5.5 Instant de OpenAI es un modelo de IA diseñado para máxima eficiencia de costos por token y alta velocidad en producción, con ventana de contexto de 400K, velocidad de 168 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 65/100 y tarifa de $0.75/

Intelligence Index65 / 100
Input Token:

$0.75 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.5%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • GPT-5.6 Luna is 4.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5.6 Luna has a larger context window (1M vs 400K tokens).
  • GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 230 tok/s vs 168 tok/s.
  • GPT-5.5 Instant leads on SWE-bench coding (74.5% vs 63.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.5 Instant
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5765
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.75 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.20 / 1M$6.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.17 / 1M$0.80 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,575 A4 pages of text400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
230 tok/s168 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
63.5%74.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
70.5%75%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.07 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
GPT-5.5 Instant
+11.0% SWE-bench lead
Costo
GPT-5.6 Luna
4.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
GPT-5.6 Luna
+37% faster generation
Contexto
GPT-5.6 Luna
1.05M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.5 Instant
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

63.5%vs74.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

70.5%vs75%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83.5%vs87.2%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1368ptsvs1396pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

11.4%vs13.6%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38.5%vs49%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

36%vs45.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

62.5%vs73.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

87%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

76.5%vs81.5%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

230 tok/s vs168 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.6 Luna0.42s
GPT-5.5 Instant0.78s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.6 Luna2.59s
GPT-5.5 Instant3.76s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.6 Luna Monthly API Bill
$1.41 / month
$0.2/1M in · $1.2/1M out
GPT-5.5 Instant Monthly API Bill
$6.64 / month
$0.75/1M in · $6/1M out
GPT-5.6 Luna saves approximately $5.23 / month (79%) under this workload.4.7x Savings

GPT-5.6 Luna · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1.1M con hasta 128K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 63.5% · GPQA Diamond 70.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 230 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 420 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($0.2/$1.2 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

GPT-5.5 Instant · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 400K con hasta 128K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 74.5% · GPQA Diamond 75%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 168 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 780 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($0.75/$6 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.5 Instant
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.19$0.95
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K52K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
20K26K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.5 Instant
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-6-lunagpt-5-5-instant
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-072026-05
Knowledge CutoffFebruary 2026December 2025
ArchitectureEfficient compact reasoning modelLow-latency compact reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 1050K windowFlat rate ($0.75/1M in) across full 400K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.02/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.075/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.5 Instant: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT-5.5 Instant?

GPT-5.5 Instant is more intelligent. It scores 65 compared with 57 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.6 Luna is faster, generating 230 tokens per second compared with 168 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper at $0.17 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.80 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5.6 Luna has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.42s compared with 0.78s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 400K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto GPT-5.6 Luna (Ideal para máxima eficiencia de costos por token y alta velocidad en producción, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como GPT-5.5 Instant (Ideal para máxima eficiencia de costos por token y alta velocidad en producción, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: GPT-5.5 Instant lidera en inteligencia general y programación, GPT-5.6 Luna ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y GPT-5.6 Luna resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, GPT-5.6 Luna o GPT-5.5 Instant?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, GPT-5.5 Instant obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de GPT-5.6 Luna frente a GPT-5.5 Instant?+

GPT-5.6 Luna cuesta $0.20 / $1.20 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que GPT-5.5 Instant cuesta $0.75 / $6.00. En costo combinado, GPT-5.6 Luna es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

GPT-5.6 Luna cuenta con 1.05M tokens de contexto frente a 400K tokens de GPT-5.5 Instant. En velocidad de inferencia, GPT-5.6 Luna ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de OpenAI y OpenAI, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).