GLM-5V-Turbo vs Hunyuan Large V2
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
GLM-5V-Turbo by Zhipu AI and Hunyuan Large V2 by Tencent represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Hunyuan Large V2 holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GLM-5V-Turbo is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Hunyuan Large V2 provides an expanded memory horizon with 512K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, GLM-5V-Turbo leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
GLM-5V-Turbo
VLM rápidolíder hosted multimodal modelo fundacional ofreciendo alto-resolución visual fundamentación, documento QA, y UI navigation.
$0.90 / 1M
$2.70 / 1M
200K tokens
N/A
Hunyuan Large V2
IA socialde Tencent 500B MoE insignia con de China largest comercial 512K ventana de contexto, especializado para nuanced dialogue, social matiz, y roleplay.
$0.70 / 1M
$2.80 / 1M
512K tokens
N/A
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Hunyuan Large V2 is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Hunyuan Large V2 has a larger context window (512K vs 200K tokens).
- GLM-5V-Turbo is faster at 85 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
| Característica | GLM-5V-Turbo | Hunyuan Large V2 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 85 | 85 |
Provider | Zhipu AI | Tencent |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.90 / 1M | $0.70 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $2.70 / 1M | $2.80 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.51 / 1M | $0.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 512K tokens~768 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 80 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 64% | 66% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.09 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GLM-5V-Turbo · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Sharp visual spatial perception y GUI element localization
- Superb multilingüe OCR un través de intricate tabular structures y financial reports
- Seamless multi-imagen análisis within un unified 200K token ventana de contexto
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Priced mayor ($0.90/1M) que pure texto GLM endpoints
- Occasionally misreads microscopic handwritten characters en bajo-contrast imagery
Hunyuan Large V2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Enormous 512K ventana de contexto ideal para procesamiento entire novels y book-length records
- inigualable emotional inteligencia, social roleplay, y colloquial chino dialogue
- Highly optimized Tencent Cloud infraestructura con dependable SLA availability
Considerations & Trade-offs
- English documentation y international community tooling son somewhat limitado
- texto-solo API; carece de nativo visión modality
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GLM-5V-Turbo | Hunyuan Large V2 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.22 | $0.22 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 20K | 22K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 6K | 7K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | GLM-5V-Turbo | Hunyuan Large V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | glm-5v-turbo | hunyuan-large-v2 |
| API Protocol | Zhipu AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Tencent REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-05 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Frontier Commercial Vision-Language Transformer | High-Scale Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | 500B total (30B active MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.9/1M in) across full 200K window | Flat rate ($0.7/1M in) across full 512K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.09/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.07/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Zhipu AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Tencent Production Safety & Alignment Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Hunyuan Large V2: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which model is faster?
GLM-5V-Turbo is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Hunyuan Large V2 is cheaper at $0.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.51 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Hunyuan Large V2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 0.49s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Hunyuan Large V2 has a larger context window, supporting 512K tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Veredicto
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose GLM-5V-Turbo if your priority is Visual RPA, mobile UI automated testing, financial document intelligence, and visual agents. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Hunyuan Large V2 if your workflow prioritizes Social chatbots, creative writing, game NPC dialogue, and extensive document summarization. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Preguntas frecuentes
How does GLM-5V-Turbo compare to Hunyuan Large V2 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
GLM-5V-Turbo costs $0.90 per 1M input tokens and $2.70 per 1M output tokens, whereas Hunyuan Large V2 costs $0.70 input and $2.80 output. Overall, Hunyuan Large V2 is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: GLM-5V-Turbo or Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo supports a context window of 200K tokens (~150k words), while Hunyuan Large V2 supports 512K tokens (~384k words). Therefore, Hunyuan Large V2 can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: GLM-5V-Turbo or Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Hunyuan Large V2 scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, GLM-5V-Turbo provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Hunyuan Large V2 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Large V2?+
GLM-5V-Turbo generates approximately 85 tokens per second, while Hunyuan Large V2 delivers 80 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, GLM-5V-Turbo provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining GLM-5V-Turbo and Hunyuan Large V2 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Hunyuan Large V2 to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to GLM-5V-Turbo. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- GLM-5V-Turbo vs GLM-5-Turbo: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Hunyuan Large V2 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs