Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 by Anthropic against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Vía rápida 5.5el ultra-rápido, bajo-costo potencia de late 2026, bringing rápido razonamiento, 200K contexto, y near-instant response speeds un cliente agentes y en tiempo real canalizaciones.
$1.00 / 1M
$5.00 / 1M
200K tokens
68.4%
GPT-6.1 Sol
Valor cercano a Astraofrece results close un GPT-6 Astra un roughly one fifth del precio — el latest 2026 lanzamiento.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
82.3%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 is faster at 160 tok/s vs 120 tok/s.
- GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 68.4%).
| Característica | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 62 | 94 |
Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.77 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 64K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 160 tok/s | 120 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 68.4% | 82.3% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 69.8% | 80.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.10 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPuntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude Haiku 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Blazing 160 tokens/sec rendimiento con ultra-bajo 220ms tiempo-un-primer-token
- Cheap $1.00 / $5.00 API precios con $0.10 cached inputs
- Integrated razonamiento modo ofreciendo mayor precisión en triaje tareas
Considerations & Trade-offs
- ventana de contexto limitado un 200K tokens rather que el 1M de Sonnet/Opus
- no intended para autónomo multifarchivo arquitectura redesigns
GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Near-Astra results un roughly un fifth del costo
- Excellent codificación y de largo alcance agente rendimiento
- sólido reliability con far menor latencia que Astra
- Near-insignia results un roughly un fifth del precio
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Still marginally behind Astra en el muy hardest razonamiento
- Same precio as GPT-6 Sol, so el upgrade decision es easy
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.70 | $2.05 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 20K | 62K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 10K | 36K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-haiku-5-5-20261001 | gpt-6-1-sol |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2026-10 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 2026 | April 2026 |
| Architecture | Ultra-Fast Lightweight Reasoning Transformer | Near-Astra unified reasoning model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $0.1/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 120 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.77 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 1.12s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Veredicto
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for en tiempo real user-facing chatbots, rápido texto clasificación, code completion, y perimetral agente enrutamiento, or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for el mejor valor modelo de frontera para profesional y agentic trabajo.
Preguntas frecuentes
Which is cheaper: Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $1/1M input and $5/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 200K tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: Anthropic & OpenAI Official Documentation