Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Codificación y razonamiento de fronteraEl modelo de frontera híbrido de Anthropic que proporciona respuestas instantáneas o razonamiento extendido mediante cadena de pensamiento, estableciendo récords en ingeniería de software.
$3.00 / 1M
$15.00 / 1M
200K tokens
70.3%
GPT-6.1 Sol
Valor cercano a Astraofrece results close un GPT-6 Astra un roughly one fifth del precio — el latest 2026 lanzamiento.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
82.3%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- GPT-6.1 Sol is 1.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
- GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 72 tok/s.
- GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 70.3%).
| Característica | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 48 | 94 |
Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $3.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $15.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $2.31 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 64K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 72 tok/s | 120 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 70.3% | 82.3% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 65% | 80.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.30 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPuntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet · Strengths & Key Advantages
- mundo-leading SWE-bench Verified codificación capacidad (70.3%)
- Dynamic razonamiento económico slider (estándar vs pensamiento modo)
- Extremely grande salida generación (up un 64K tokens por turn)
- 90% discount en cached entrada prompts ($0.30 por 1M tokens)
Considerations & Trade-offs
- mayor salida precio ($15/1M) en comparación con ligero utility modelos
- No nativo audio entrada (requiere audio-un-texto preprocessing)
GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Near-Astra results un roughly un fifth del costo
- Excellent codificación y de largo alcance agente rendimiento
- sólido reliability con far menor latencia que Astra
- Near-insignia results un roughly un fifth del precio
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Still marginally behind Astra en el muy hardest razonamiento
- Same precio as GPT-6 Sol, so el upgrade decision es easy
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.42 | $2.05 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 41K | 62K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 22K | 36K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-3-7-sonnet-20250201 | gpt-6-1-sol |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2025-02 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | November 2024 | April 2026 |
| Architecture | Hybrid Reasoning MoE | Near-Astra unified reasoning model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $0.3/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 72 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.31 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.52s compared with 1.12s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Veredicto
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet for ingeniería de software compleja, agentes de desarrollo y demostración matemática meditada, or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for el mejor valor modelo de frontera para profesional y agentic trabajo.
Preguntas frecuentes
Which is cheaper: Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/1M input and $15/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: Anthropic & OpenAI Official Documentation