Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Llama 4 Behemoth by Meta and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B by NVIDIA represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Llama 4 Behemoth holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Llama 4 Behemoth is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Llama 4 Behemoth provides an expanded memory horizon with 10,000K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
بدّل وقارن بين أي نموذجين
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Llama 4 Behemoth
نموذج مفتوح الأوزاننموذج Llama 4 Behemoth المقدم من Meta يوفر نافذة سياق تصل إلى 10M رمز، بتكلفة $0 لكل مليون رمز إدخال و$0 لكل مليون رمز إخراج، ومصمم للبرمجة والاستدلال وتطبيقات الأعمال.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
10M tokens
75%
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
نموذج مفتوح الأوزاننموذج Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B المقدم من NVIDIA يوفر نافذة سياق تصل إلى 1M رمز، بتكلفة $1 لكل مليون رمز إدخال و$3 لكل مليون رمز إخراج، ومصمم للبرمجة والاستدلال وتطبيقات الأعمال.
$1.00 / 1M
$3.00 / 1M
1M tokens
64.5%
أهم الفروقات في لمحة
- Llama 4 Behemoth is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window (10M vs 1M tokens).
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is faster at 65 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.
- Llama 4 Behemoth leads on SWE-bench coding (75.0% vs 64.5%).
| Feature | Llama 4 Behemoth | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 93 | 60 |
Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $3.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.68 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 10M tokens~15,000 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 64K | 66K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 45 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 75% | 64.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 82% | 76% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.25 / 1M |
من يتفوق في كل مجال؟
At-a-glance decision frameworkنتائج الاختبارات المعيارية الموثقة
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
زمن الاستجابة والسرعة
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
محاكي تكلفة الرموز التفاعلي
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Llama 4 Behemoth · Strengths & Key Advantages
- بنية Colossal sparse MoE architecture (288B active / 2T total, 16-of-2 MoE) متطورة من Meta مع سعة سياق تبلغ 10M رمز
- كفاءة عالية في التكلفة ($0/1M إدخال و$0/1M إخراج) وسرعة استجابة ممتازة
- أداء قوي في اختبارات البرمجة، الاستدلال المنطقي، ودعم اللغات المتعددة
Considerations & Trade-offs
- يتطلب إدارة دقيقة لاستهلاك الرموز عند استخدام نافذة السياق الكاملة
- قد يحتاج إلى ضبط دقيق للتعليمات (Prompt Engineering) في المهام التخصصية المعقدة
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- بنية Colossal Sparse MoE (550B Total / 55B Active) متطورة من NVIDIA مع سعة سياق تبلغ 1M رمز
- كفاءة عالية في التكلفة ($1/1M إدخال و$3/1M إخراج) وسرعة استجابة ممتازة
- أداء قوي في اختبارات البرمجة، الاستدلال المنطقي، ودعم اللغات المتعددة
Considerations & Trade-offs
- يتطلب إدارة دقيقة لاستهلاك الرموز عند استخدام نافذة السياق الكاملة
- قد يحتاج إلى ضبط دقيق للتعليمات (Prompt Engineering) في المهام التخصصية المعقدة
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Llama 4 Behemoth | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.85 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 35K | 48K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 15K | 24K |
المواصفات التقنية
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Llama 4 Behemoth | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | meta-llama/Llama-4-Behemoth | nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2026-06 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Colossal sparse MoE architecture (288B active / 2T total, 16-of-2 MoE) | Colossal Sparse MoE (550B Total / 55B Active) |
| Parameters | 2T total / 288B active (16-of-2 MoE) | 550B (55B active MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 1000K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Cached input at $0.25/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1240 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4300 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 341 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1183 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: إجابات سريعة (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Llama 4 Behemoth or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?
Llama 4 Behemoth is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 4 Behemoth is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.68 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 1.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window, supporting 10M tokens compared with 1M tokens.
الحكم النهائي
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Llama 4 Behemoth if your priority is National laboratories, large enterprise AI clusters, and extreme scientific modeling. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B if your workflow prioritizes National AI initiatives, sovereign defense intelligence, and enterprise-wide autonomous agent swarms. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
الأسئلة الشائعة (FAQ)
How does Llama 4 Behemoth compare to Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Llama 4 Behemoth costs $0.00 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $1.00 input and $3.00 output. Overall, Llama 4 Behemoth is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Llama 4 Behemoth or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?+
Llama 4 Behemoth supports a context window of 10,000K tokens (~7,500k words), while Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B supports 1,000K tokens (~750k words). Therefore, Llama 4 Behemoth can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Llama 4 Behemoth or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?+
Llama 4 Behemoth scores 75% on SWE-bench Verified while Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 64.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Llama 4 Behemoth holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Llama 4 Behemoth and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?+
Llama 4 Behemoth features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Llama 4 Behemoth and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?+
Llama 4 Behemoth generates approximately 45 tokens per second, while Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B delivers 65 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Llama 4 Behemoth and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Llama 4 Behemoth to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Command A Plus vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Llama 4 Behemoth vs Llama 5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Gemini 4 Argon: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs GPT-OSS 120B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Llama 5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
المصادر الرسمية: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs