Head-to-Head Model Comparison

QwQ Plus vs Qwen Max

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
QwQ Plus vs Qwen Max: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

QwQ Plus di Alibaba e Qwen Max di Alibaba sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. QwQ Plus offre una finestra di contesto di 131.1K token a $0.40/$1.60 per milione di token, mentre Qwen Max mette a disposizione 32.8K token di contesto a $1.60/$6.40 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

QwQ Plus

Motore di Ragionamento Profondo

QwQ Plus di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 70 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 84/100 e tariffa di $

Intelligence Index84 / 100
Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.60 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

45%

Alibaba

Qwen Max

Modello di Generazione Classica

Qwen Max di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per gli assistenti conversazionali, la sintesi documentale e i flussi di lavoro aziendali, con finestra di contesto da 33K, velocità di 65 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 78/100 e tariffa

Intelligence Index78 / 100
Input Token:

$1.60 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.40 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.5%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • QwQ Plus is 4.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • QwQ Plus has a larger context window (131K vs 33K tokens).
  • QwQ Plus is faster at 70 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • QwQ Plus leads on SWE-bench coding (45.0% vs 32.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwQ PlusQwen Max
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8478
Provider
AlibabaAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.40 / 1M$1.60 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.60 / 1M$6.40 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.27 / 1M$1.07 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
70 tok/s65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
45%32.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
65.2%48%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.04 / 1M$0.16 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
QwQ Plus
+12.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
QwQ Plus
4.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
QwQ Plus
+8% faster generation
Context
QwQ Plus
131.1K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

QwQ PlusQwen Max
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

45%vs32.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

65.2%vs48%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

82%vs78.2%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1335ptsvs1285pts
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

62%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

80%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

70 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
QwQ Plus0.85s
Qwen Max0.58s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
QwQ Plus7.99s
Qwen Max8.27s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
QwQ Plus Monthly API Bill
$2.10 / month
$0.4/1M in · $1.6/1M out
Qwen Max Monthly API Bill
$8.40 / month
$1.6/1M in · $6.4/1M out
QwQ Plus saves approximately $6.30 / month (75%) under this workload.4.0x Savings

QwQ Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 45% · GPQA Diamond 65.2%)
  • Throughput elevato di 70 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 850 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($0.4/$1.6 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Qwen Max · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 33K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 32.5% · GPQA Diamond 48%)
  • Throughput elevato di 65 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 580 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($1.6/$6.4 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwQ PlusQwen Max
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.12$0.18
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
14K6K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwQ PlusQwen Max
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwq-plus-instructqwen-max-instruct
API ProtocolAlibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Alibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2025-032024-04
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025September 2023
ArchitectureDeep Reasoning Chain-of-Thought TransformerDense Autoregressive Transformer with Multi-Head Attention
Parameters32B (Distilled Reasoning Engine)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.4/1M in) across full 131K windowFlat rate ($1.6/1M in) across full 33K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.04/1M tokensCached input at $0.16/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

QwQ Plus vs Qwen Max: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, QwQ Plus or Qwen Max?

QwQ Plus is more intelligent. It scores 84 compared with 78 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

QwQ Plus is faster, generating 70 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.27 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.07 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen Max has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.58s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

QwQ Plus has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia QwQ Plus (Ideale per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Qwen Max (Ideale per gli assistenti conversazionali, la sintesi documentale e i flussi di lavoro aziendali, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: QwQ Plus guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, QwQ Plus garantisce una generazione più rapida e QwQ Plus offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, QwQ Plus o Qwen Max?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale QwQ Plus. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra QwQ Plus e Qwen Max?+

QwQ Plus costa $0.40 / $1.60 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Qwen Max costa $1.60 / $6.40. Nel costo combinato, QwQ Plus risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

QwQ Plus supporta 131.1K token di contesto contro 32.8K token di Qwen Max, mentre QwQ Plus offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Alibaba e Alibaba, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).