Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Devstral Medium

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Devstral Medium: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Qwen3 Coder Flash di Alibaba e Devstral Medium di Mistral AI sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Qwen3 Coder Flash offre una finestra di contesto di 1M token a $0.10/$0.40 per milione di token, mentre Devstral Medium mette a disposizione 128K token di contesto a $0.80/$2.40 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Inferenza Ultra-Rapida

Qwen3 Coder Flash di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per le interazioni in tempo reale a bassissima latenza e il routing ad alto volume, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 130 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 77/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index77 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Mistral AI

Devstral Medium

IA Agentica e Strumenti Autonomi

Devstral Medium di Mistral AI è un modello di IA progettato per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, con finestra di contesto da 128K, velocità di 75 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 52/100 e tariffa d

Intelligence Index52 / 100
Input Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.40 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

51.5%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Qwen3 Coder Flash is 7.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Qwen3 Coder Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
  • Qwen3 Coder Flash is faster at 130 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3 Coder FlashDevstral Medium
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7752
Provider
AlibabaMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.80 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.40 / 1M$2.40 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.07 / 1M$0.54 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
130 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A51.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
N/A62%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.20 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Qwen3 Coder Flash
7.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Flash
+73% faster generation
Context
Qwen3 Coder Flash
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3 Coder FlashDevstral Medium
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs51.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs62%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74.5%vs80.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1265ptsvs1330pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs45%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

61.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs72%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs78%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

130 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3 Coder Flash0.33s
Devstral Medium0.50s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3 Coder Flash4.18s
Devstral Medium7.17s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3 Coder Flash Monthly API Bill
$0.53 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.4/1M out
Devstral Medium Monthly API Bill
$3.66 / month
$0.8/1M in · $2.4/1M out
Qwen3 Coder Flash saves approximately $3.13 / month (86%) under this workload.7.0x Savings

Qwen3 Coder Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (MMLU-Pro 74.5% · Arena Elo 1265)
  • Throughput elevato di 130 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 330 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($0.1/$0.4 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Devstral Medium · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 128K con capacità massima di output fino a 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 51.5% · GPQA Diamond 62%)
  • Throughput elevato di 75 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 500 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($0.8/$2.4 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3 Coder FlashDevstral Medium
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.03$0.55
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
15K38K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K18K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3 Coder FlashDevstral Medium
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-coder-flash-instructdevstral-medium-latest
API ProtocolAlibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Mistral AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2025-072025-07
Knowledge CutoffMay 2025May 2025
ArchitectureOptimized Lightweight Hosted Code TransformerHigh-Capacity Agentic Code Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential (~70B)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 1000K windowFlat rate ($0.8/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.01/1M tokensCached input at $0.2/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedMistral AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Devstral Medium: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3 Coder Flash or Devstral Medium?

Qwen3 Coder Flash is more intelligent. It scores 77 compared with 52 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3 Coder Flash is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper at $0.07 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.54 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3 Coder Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.33s compared with 0.50s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Qwen3 Coder Flash (Ideale per le interazioni in tempo reale a bassissima latenza e il routing ad alto volume, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Devstral Medium (Ideale per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Qwen3 Coder Flash guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Qwen3 Coder Flash garantisce una generazione più rapida e Qwen3 Coder Flash offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Qwen3 Coder Flash o Devstral Medium?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Qwen3 Coder Flash. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Qwen3 Coder Flash e Devstral Medium?+

Qwen3 Coder Flash costa $0.10 / $0.40 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Devstral Medium costa $0.80 / $2.40. Nel costo combinato, Qwen3 Coder Flash risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Qwen3 Coder Flash supporta 1M token di contesto contro 128K token di Devstral Medium, mentre Qwen3 Coder Flash offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Alibaba e Mistral AI, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).