GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3 (8B)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3 (8B): Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mixtral 8x7B di Mistral AI e Llama 3 (8B) di Meta sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Mixtral 8x7B offre una finestra di contesto di 32.8K token a $0.20/$0.20 per milione di token, mentre Llama 3 (8B) mette a disposizione 8.2K token di contesto a $0.05/$0.10 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x7B

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

Mixtral 8x7B di Mistral AI è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 33K, velocità di 130 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 37/100

Intelligence Index37 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Meta

Llama 3 (8B)

Inferenza Ultra-Rapida

Llama 3 (8B) di Meta è un modello di IA progettato per le interazioni in tempo reale a bassissima latenza e il routing ad alto volume, con finestra di contesto da 8K, velocità di 210 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 34/100 e tariffa di $0

Intelligence Index34 / 100
Input Token:

$0.05 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Context Window:

8.2K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

12%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Llama 3 (8B) is 3.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mixtral 8x7B has a larger context window (33K vs 8K tokens).
  • Llama 3 (8B) is faster at 210 tok/s vs 130 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMixtral 8x7BLlama 3 (8B)
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3734
Provider
Mistral AIMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.05 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.10 / 1M$0.03 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
4K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
130 tok/s210 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A12%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
38%34.2%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Llama 3 (8B)
3.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Llama 3 (8B)
+62% faster generation
Context
Mixtral 8x7B
32.8K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mixtral 8x7BLlama 3 (8B)
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs12%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

38%vs34.2%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

66.5%vs62.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1195ptsvs1150pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

130 tok/s vs210 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mixtral 8x7B0.38s
Llama 3 (8B)0.22s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mixtral 8x7B4.23s
Llama 3 (8B)2.60s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mixtral 8x7B Monthly API Bill
$0.56 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.2/1M out
Llama 3 (8B) Monthly API Bill
$0.18 / month
$0.05/1M in · $0.1/1M out
Llama 3 (8B) saves approximately $0.37 / month (67%) under this workload.3.0x Savings

Mixtral 8x7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 33K con capacità massima di output fino a 4K token (GPQA Diamond 38% · MMLU-Pro 66.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 130 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 380 ms
  • Pesi aperti (46.7B (12.9B )) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Llama 3 (8B) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 8K con capacità massima di output fino a 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 12% · GPQA Diamond 34.2%)
  • Throughput elevato di 210 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 220 ms
  • Pesi aperti (8B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMixtral 8x7BLlama 3 (8B)
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMixtral 8x7BLlama 3 (8B)
Official API Model ID (SDK)mixtral-8x7b-latestmeta-llama/Llama-3-(8B)
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2023-122024-04
Knowledge CutoffLate 2023March 2024
ArchitectureSparse Mixture of Experts (MoE, 2 active of 8)Dense GQA Transformer with 128K Tokenizer
Parameters46.7B (12.9B active)8B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 33K windowFlat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 8K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokensCached input at $0.0125/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 29 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 100 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3 (8B): Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mixtral 8x7B or Llama 3 (8B)?

Mixtral 8x7B is more intelligent. It scores 37 compared with 34 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 3 (8B) is faster, generating 210 tokens per second compared with 130 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3 (8B) is cheaper at $0.03 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.10 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3 (8B) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.38s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mixtral 8x7B has a larger context window, supporting 32.8K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Mixtral 8x7B (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Llama 3 (8B) (Ideale per le interazioni in tempo reale a bassissima latenza e il routing ad alto volume, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Mixtral 8x7B guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Llama 3 (8B) garantisce una generazione più rapida e Llama 3 (8B) offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Mixtral 8x7B o Llama 3 (8B)?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Mixtral 8x7B. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Mixtral 8x7B e Llama 3 (8B)?+

Mixtral 8x7B costa $0.20 / $0.20 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Llama 3 (8B) costa $0.05 / $0.10. Nel costo combinato, Llama 3 (8B) risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Mixtral 8x7B supporta 32.8K token di contesto contro 8.2K token di Llama 3 (8B), mentre Llama 3 (8B) offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Mistral AI e Meta, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).