Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 3 (8B) vs Llama 3 (70B)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Llama 3 (8B) vs Llama 3 (70B): Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Llama 3 (8B) di Meta e Llama 3 (70B) di Meta sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Llama 3 (8B) offre una finestra di contesto di 8.2K token a $0.05/$0.10 per milione di token, mentre Llama 3 (70B) mette a disposizione 8.2K token di contesto a $0.35/$0.80 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Meta

Llama 3 (8B)

Inferenza Ultra-Rapida

Llama 3 (8B) di Meta è un modello di IA progettato per le interazioni in tempo reale a bassissima latenza e il routing ad alto volume, con finestra di contesto da 8K, velocità di 210 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 34/100 e tariffa di $0

Intelligence Index34 / 100
Input Token:

$0.05 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Context Window:

8.2K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

12%

Meta

Llama 3 (70B)

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

Llama 3 (70B) di Meta è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 8K, velocità di 110 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 42/100 e tar

Intelligence Index42 / 100
Input Token:

$0.35 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

8.2K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

24%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Llama 3 (8B) is 7.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Llama 3 (8B) is faster at 210 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Llama 3 (70B) leads on SWE-bench coding (24.0% vs 12.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureLlama 3 (8B)Llama 3 (70B)
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3442
Provider
MetaMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.35 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.80 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.03 / 1M$0.21 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
4K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
210 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
12%24%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
34.2%46%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.09 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Llama 3 (70B)
+12.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 3 (8B)
7.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Llama 3 (8B)
+91% faster generation
Context
Tied
8.2K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 3 (8B)Llama 3 (70B)
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

12%vs24%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

34.2%vs46%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

62.5%vs72%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1150ptsvs1245pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

210 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Llama 3 (8B)0.22s
Llama 3 (70B)0.42s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Llama 3 (8B)2.60s
Llama 3 (70B)4.97s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Llama 3 (8B) Monthly API Bill
$0.18 / month
$0.05/1M in · $0.1/1M out
Llama 3 (70B) Monthly API Bill
$1.38 / month
$0.35/1M in · $0.8/1M out
Llama 3 (8B) saves approximately $1.19 / month (87%) under this workload.7.5x Savings

Llama 3 (8B) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 8K con capacità massima di output fino a 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 12% · GPQA Diamond 34.2%)
  • Throughput elevato di 210 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 220 ms
  • Pesi aperti (8B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Llama 3 (70B) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 8K con capacità massima di output fino a 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 24% · GPQA Diamond 46%)
  • Throughput elevato di 110 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 420 ms
  • Pesi aperti (70B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricLlama 3 (8B)Llama 3 (70B)
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureLlama 3 (8B)Llama 3 (70B)
Official API Model ID (SDK)meta-llama/Llama-3-(8B)meta-llama/Llama-3-(70B)
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-042024-04
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2024March 2024
ArchitectureDense GQA Transformer with 128K TokenizerGQA High-Capacity Transformer
Parameters8B70B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 8K windowFlat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 8K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.0125/1M tokensCached input at $0.0875/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Llama 3 (8B) vs Llama 3 (70B): Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 3 (8B) or Llama 3 (70B)?

Llama 3 (70B) is more intelligent. It scores 42 compared with 34 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 3 (8B) is faster, generating 210 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3 (8B) is cheaper at $0.03 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.21 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3 (8B) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.22s compared with 0.42s.

Verdetto

Sia Llama 3 (8B) (Ideale per le interazioni in tempo reale a bassissima latenza e il routing ad alto volume, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Llama 3 (70B) (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Llama 3 (70B) guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Llama 3 (8B) garantisce una generazione più rapida e Llama 3 (8B) offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Llama 3 (8B) o Llama 3 (70B)?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Llama 3 (70B). Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Llama 3 (8B) e Llama 3 (70B)?+

Llama 3 (8B) costa $0.05 / $0.10 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Llama 3 (70B) costa $0.35 / $0.80. Nel costo combinato, Llama 3 (8B) risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Llama 3 (8B) supporta 8.2K token di contesto contro 8.2K token di Llama 3 (70B), mentre Llama 3 (8B) offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Meta e Meta, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).