Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (4)
NVIDIAAnthropicopen-sourceflagship

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 by NVIDIA against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Modello a Pesi Aperti

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 di NVIDIA è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 131K token e tariffazione API di $0.25/1M token in input e $0.5/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione azien

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

40%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Modello di Ragionamento Profondo

Claude Opus 5.5 di Anthropic è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 1M token e tariffazione API di $4.0/1M token in input e $20.0/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 26.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 131K tokens).
  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is faster at 95 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 40.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Claude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4694
Provider
NVIDIAAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.25 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.50 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.16 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
95 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
40%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
56%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.08 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+44.6% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
26.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+22% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Claude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

40%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

56%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1305ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

36%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

66%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

74%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

95 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v10.40s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v15.66s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 Monthly API Bill
$0.95 / month
$0.25/1M in · $0.5/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 saves approximately $23.66 / month (96%) under this workload.26.0x Savings

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Architettura Compact High-Density Transformer avanzata di NVIDIA con supporto fino a 131K token di contesto
  • Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($0.25/1M input, $0.5/1M output) e bassa latenza
  • Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
  • Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Architettura Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer avanzata di Anthropic con supporto fino a 1M token di contesto
  • Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($4.0/1M input, $20.0/1M output) e bassa latenza
  • Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
  • Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Claude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.22$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
30K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
12K42K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Claude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)llama-3-3-nemotron-super-49b-v1claude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-042026-09
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025June 2026
ArchitectureCompact High-Density TransformerExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
Parameters49BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 131K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.08/1M tokens$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 30 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 105 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is cheaper at $0.16 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.40s compared with 1.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Verdetto

Choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione nvidia, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione anthropic.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports 131K tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: NVIDIA & Anthropic Official Documentation