GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K2

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K2: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking di Moonshot AI e Kimi K2 di Moonshot AI sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Kimi K2 Thinking offre una finestra di contesto di 262.1K token a $0.00/$0.00 per milione di token, mentre Kimi K2 mette a disposizione 131.1K token di contesto a $0.00/$0.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Moonshot AI

Kimi K2 Thinking

Ragionamento a Pesi Aperti

Kimi K2 Thinking di Moonshot AI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, con finestra di contesto da 262K, velocità di 55 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 85/100 e ta

Intelligence Index85 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

50%

Moonshot AI

Kimi K2

IA Agentica e Strumenti Autonomi

Kimi K2 di Moonshot AI è un modello di IA progettato per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 62 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 83/100 e tariffa di acces

Intelligence Index83 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

46%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking has a larger context window (262K vs 131K tokens).
  • Kimi K2 is faster at 62 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking leads on SWE-bench coding (50.0% vs 46.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureKimi K2 ThinkingKimi K2
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8583
Provider
Moonshot AIMoonshot AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
32K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
55 tok/s62 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
50%46%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
70%66.5%

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Kimi K2 Thinking
+4.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
Kimi K2
+13% faster generation
Context
Kimi K2 Thinking
262.1K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Kimi K2 ThinkingKimi K2
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

50%vs46%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

70%vs66.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

82.5%vs80.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1375ptsvs1360pts
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

82.5%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs62 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Kimi K2 Thinking0.95s
Kimi K20.64s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Kimi K2 Thinking10.04s
Kimi K28.70s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Kimi K2 Thinking Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Kimi K2 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Kimi K2 Thinking · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 262K con capacità massima di output fino a 32K token (SWE-bench Verified 50% · GPQA Diamond 70%)
  • Throughput elevato di 55 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 950 ms
  • Pesi aperti (1T total (32B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Kimi K2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 46% · GPQA Diamond 66.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 62 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 640 ms
  • Pesi aperti (1T total (32B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricKimi K2 ThinkingKimi K2
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
28K22K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
16K8K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureKimi K2 ThinkingKimi K2
Official API Model ID (SDK)kimi-k2-thinkingkimi-k2
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-112025-07
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2025May 2025
ArchitectureDeliberate Reasoning Open Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsTrillion-Scale Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer
Parameters1T total (32B active MoE)1T total (32B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 620 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 2150 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 620 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 2150 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Kimi K2: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Kimi K2 Thinking or Kimi K2?

Kimi K2 Thinking is more intelligent. It scores 85 compared with 83 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Kimi K2 is faster, generating 62 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Kimi K2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.64s compared with 0.95s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Kimi K2 Thinking has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Kimi K2 Thinking (Ideale per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Kimi K2 (Ideale per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Kimi K2 Thinking guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Kimi K2 garantisce una generazione più rapida e Kimi K2 Thinking offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Kimi K2 Thinking o Kimi K2?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Kimi K2 Thinking. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Kimi K2 Thinking e Kimi K2?+

Kimi K2 Thinking costa $0.00 / $0.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Kimi K2 costa $0.00 / $0.00. Nel costo combinato, Kimi K2 Thinking risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Kimi K2 Thinking supporta 262.1K token di contesto contro 131.1K token di Kimi K2, mentre Kimi K2 offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Moonshot AI e Moonshot AI, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).