Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GLM-4.7-FlashXProfile

Qwen3.5 122B-A10BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Zhipu AI

GLM-4.7-FlashX

Modello Leggero ed Economico

GLM-4.7-FlashX di Zhipu AI è un modello di IA progettato per la massima efficienza dei costi per token e l’inferenza rapida in produzione, con finestra di contesto da 200K, velocità di 150 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 76/100 e tariffa

Intelligence Index76 / 100

Input Token:

$0.02 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.04 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

IA Multimodale Nativa

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, con finestra di contesto da 262K, velocità di 78 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 82/1

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a larger context window (262K vs 200K tokens).
GLM-4.7-FlashX is faster at 150 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GLM-4.7-FlashX	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	76	82
Provider	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.02 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.04 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.01 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text	262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	150 tok/s	78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	N/A
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	N/A	65.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

GLM-4.7-FlashX

+92% faster generation

Context

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

262.1K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GLM-4.7-FlashXQwen3.5 122B-A10B

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs65.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74.5%vs80.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1290ptsvs1350pts

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

150 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GLM-4.7-FlashX0.26s

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B0.51s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GLM-4.7-FlashX3.59s

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B6.92s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GLM-4.7-FlashX Monthly API Bill

$0.07 / month

$0.02/1M in · $0.04/1M out

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B saves approximately $0.07 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GLM-4.7-FlashX · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 200K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (MMLU-Pro 74.5% · Arena Elo 1290)
Throughput elevato di 150 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 260 ms
Pesi aperti pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 262K con capacità massima di output fino a 16K token (GPQA Diamond 65.5% · MMLU-Pro 80.5%)
Throughput elevato di 78 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 510 ms
Pesi aperti (122B total (10B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GLM-4.7-FlashX	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.01	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	13K	18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	1K	5K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GLM-4.7-FlashX	Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	glm-4-7-flashx	qwen3-5-122b-a10b-instruct
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-01	2026-02
Knowledge Cutoff	November 2025	December 2025
Architecture	Enhanced Latency-Optimized Transformer	Efficient Open Multimodal MoE Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	122B total (10B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.02/1M in) across full 200K window	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.003/1M tokens	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 262 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GLM-4.7-FlashX or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is more intelligent. It scores 82 compared with 76 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GLM-4.7-FlashX is faster, generating 150 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.01 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GLM-4.7-FlashX has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.26s compared with 0.51s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia GLM-4.7-FlashX (Ideale per la massima efficienza dei costi per token e l’inferenza rapida in produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (Ideale per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, GLM-4.7-FlashX garantisce una generazione più rapida e Qwen3.5 122B-A10B offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, GLM-4.7-FlashX o Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Qwen3.5 122B-A10B. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra GLM-4.7-FlashX e Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?+

GLM-4.7-FlashX costa $0.02 / $0.04 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costa $0.00 / $0.00. Nel costo combinato, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

GLM-4.7-FlashX supporta 200K token di contesto contro 262.1K token di Qwen3.5 122B-A10B, mentre GLM-4.7-FlashX offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

GLM-4.7-FlashX

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

GLM-4.7-FlashX · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Specifiche Tecniche

GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Verdetto

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Related reading