Gemini Embedding 2 vs GPT-6 Astra
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Gemini Embedding 2 by Google against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Gemini Embedding 2
Modello IA ad Alte PrestazioniGemini Embedding 2 di Google è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 8K token e tariffazione API di $0.2/1M token in input e $0/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.
$0.20 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
8.2K tokens
N/A
GPT-6 Astra
Modello di Ragionamento ProfondoGPT-6 Astra di OpenAI è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 1M token e tariffazione API di $10.0/1M token in input e $50.0/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.
$10.00 / 1M
$50.00 / 1M
272K tokens
82.4%
Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio
- Gemini Embedding 2 is 205.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 8K tokens).
- Gemini Embedding 2 is faster at 350 tok/s vs 100 tok/s.
| Feature | Gemini Embedding 2 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 78 | 96 |
Provider | OpenAI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.04 / 1M | $7.70 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text | 272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 350 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 82.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 80.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
Chi vince in ogni categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Punteggi Benchmark Verificati
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenza e Tempo di Risposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini Embedding 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Architettura Unified multimodal joint-embedding transformer avanzata di Google con supporto fino a 8K token di contesto
- Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($0.2/1M input, $0/1M output) e bassa latenza
- Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
- L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
- Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato
GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Architettura Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT avanzata di OpenAI con supporto fino a 1M token di contesto
- Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($10.0/1M input, $50.0/1M output) e bassa latenza
- Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
- L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
- Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini Embedding 2 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.08 | $2.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 0K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 32K |
Specifiche Tecniche
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini Embedding 2 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-embedding-2 | gpt-6-astra |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Unified multimodal joint-embedding transformer | Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 8K window | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0/1M with configurable TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision, audio |
| Output Modalities | embedding | text, audio |
Gemini Embedding 2 vs GPT-6 Astra: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini Embedding 2 or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 78 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini Embedding 2 is faster, generating 350 tokens per second compared with 100 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper at $0.04 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini Embedding 2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.20s compared with 0.95s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.
Verdetto
Choose Gemini Embedding 2 for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione google, or choose GPT-6 Astra for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione openai.
Domande Frequenti (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Gemini Embedding 2 or GPT-6 Astra?+
Gemini Embedding 2 costs $0.2/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemini Embedding 2 or GPT-6 Astra?+
Gemini Embedding 2 supports 8K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fonti ufficiali: Google & OpenAI Official Documentation