Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (4)
GoogleAnthropiclightweightflagship

Compare Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B by Google against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B

Modello IA ad Alte Prestazioni

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B di Google è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 1.0M token e tariffazione API di $0.0375/1M token in input e $0.15/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.

Intelligence Index37 / 100
Input Token:

$0.04 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

24.5%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Modello di Ragionamento Profondo

Claude Opus 5.5 di Anthropic è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 1M token e tariffazione API di $4.0/1M token in input e $20.0/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B is 119.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B is faster at 160 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 24.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 1.5 Flash-8BClaude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3794
Provider
GoogleAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.04 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.15 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.03 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
160 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
24.5%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
38.2%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+60.1% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
119.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
+105% faster generation
Context
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B
1.05M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8BClaude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

24.5%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

38.2%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

58.6%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1220ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

3.5%vs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

16.5%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

17.8%vs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

31.4%vs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

34.5%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

69.2%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

160 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B0.25s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B3.38s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B Monthly API Bill
$0.21 / month
$0.0375/1M in · $0.15/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B saves approximately $24.39 / month (99%) under this workload.119.3x Savings

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Architettura High-Throughput Multimodal Transformer avanzata di Google con supporto fino a 1.0M token di contesto
  • Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($0.0375/1M input, $0.15/1M output) e bassa latenza
  • Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
  • Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Architettura Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer avanzata di Anthropic con supporto fino a 1M token di contesto
  • Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($4.0/1M input, $20.0/1M output) e bassa latenza
  • Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
  • Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 1.5 Flash-8BClaude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.04$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
18K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K42K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 1.5 Flash-8BClaude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-1-5-flash-8bclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2024-102026-09
Knowledge CutoffMay 2024June 2026
ArchitectureHigh-Throughput Multimodal TransformerExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
Parameters8BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.01/1M with configurable TTL$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B vs Claude Opus 5.5: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 37 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B is cheaper at $0.03 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.25s compared with 1.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Verdetto

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione google, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione anthropic.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B costs $0.0375/1M input and $0.15/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B supports 1.0M tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Google & Anthropic Official Documentation