ERNIE Speed vs GPT-6 Astra
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare ERNIE Speed by Baidu against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
ERNIE Speed
Modello a Pesi ApertiERNIE Speed di Baidu è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 128K token e tariffazione API di $0/1M token in input e $0/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
GPT-6 Astra
Modello di Ragionamento ProfondoGPT-6 Astra di OpenAI è un modello di intelligenza artificiale con finestra di contesto da 1M token e tariffazione API di $10.0/1M token in input e $50.0/1M in output, ideale per coding, ragionamento e automazione aziendale.
$10.00 / 1M
$50.00 / 1M
272K tokens
82.4%
Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio
- ERNIE Speed is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 128K tokens).
- ERNIE Speed is faster at 175 tok/s vs 100 tok/s.
| Feature | ERNIE Speed | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 68 | 96 |
Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $7.70 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 175 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 82.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 80.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
Chi vince in ogni categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Punteggi Benchmark Verificati
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenza e Tempo di Risposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
ERNIE Speed · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Architettura Distilled High-Throughput Transformer avanzata di Baidu con supporto fino a 128K token di contesto
- Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($0/1M input, $0/1M output) e bassa latenza
- Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
- L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
- Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato
GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Architettura Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT avanzata di OpenAI con supporto fino a 1M token di contesto
- Ottimo rapporto qualità-prezzo ($10.0/1M input, $50.0/1M output) e bassa latenza
- Elevate prestazioni nei benchmark di programmazione, logica e comprensione multilingue
Considerations & Trade-offs
- L'utilizzo intensivo di contesti molto ampi richiede un attento monitoraggio dei costi dei token
- Per casi d'uso verticali complessi è consigliabile un prompt engineering mirato
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | ERNIE Speed | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $2.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 8K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 32K |
Specifiche Tecniche
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | ERNIE Speed | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | ernie-speed | gpt-6-astra |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2024-03 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2023 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Distilled High-Throughput Transformer | Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT |
| Parameters | Confidential / 8B Scale | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text, audio |
ERNIE Speed vs GPT-6 Astra: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, ERNIE Speed or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 68 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
ERNIE Speed is faster, generating 175 tokens per second compared with 100 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
ERNIE Speed is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
ERNIE Speed has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.23s compared with 0.95s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Verdetto
Choose ERNIE Speed for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione baidu, or choose GPT-6 Astra for automazione enterprise, sviluppo software, agenti ia autonomi e pipeline di produzione openai.
Domande Frequenti (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: ERNIE Speed or GPT-6 Astra?+
ERNIE Speed costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: ERNIE Speed or GPT-6 Astra?+
ERNIE Speed supports 128K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonConfronta
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fonti ufficiali: Baidu & OpenAI Official Documentation