Head-to-Head Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (4)
DeepSeekOpenAIreasoningflagship

Compare DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B by DeepSeek against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Ragionamento a Pesi Aperti

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B di DeepSeek è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 58 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 46

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

51.2%

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

GPT-6.1 Sol di OpenAI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 120 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 94/100

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 14.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window (1M vs 131K tokens).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 51.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-6.1 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4694
Provider
DeepSeekOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.60 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.11 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
58 tok/s120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
51.2%82.3%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
65.9%80.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+31.1% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B
14.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6.1 Sol
+107% faster generation
Context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-6.1 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

51.2%vs82.3%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

65.9%vs80.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.3%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1308ptsvs1519pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.4%vs18.1%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

31%vs63.6%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

37.1%vs54.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

57.2%vs79.7%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

72.6%vs93.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68.4%vs91%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

58 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.76s
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B9.38s
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B Monthly API Bill
$0.87 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.6/1M out
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B saves approximately $11.28 / month (93%) under this workload.14.0x Savings

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 51.2% · GPQA Diamond 65.9%)
  • Throughput elevato di 58 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 760 ms
  • Pesi aperti (32B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 82.3% · GPQA Diamond 80.8%)
  • Throughput elevato di 120 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1120 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$10 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-6.1 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.26$2.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K62K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
19K36K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-6.1 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)deepseek-reasonergpt-6-1-sol
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-012026-09
Knowledge CutoffJuly 2024April 2026
ArchitectureDense Distilled Reasoning TransformerNear-Astra unified reasoning model
Parameters32BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 131K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.02/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper at $0.11 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.76s compared with 1.12s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Verdetto

Choose DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B for ideale per il ragionamento chain-of-thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, sistemi rag aziendali e integrazioni api scalabili., or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi rag aziendali e integrazioni api scalabili..

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.2/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 131K tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: DeepSeek & OpenAI Official Documentation