Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (4)
AnthropicGoogleflagshipflagship

Compare Claude Opus 5 by Anthropic against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

Claude Opus 5 di Anthropic è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 68 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 75/

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.1%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodale Nativa

Gemini 4 Argon di Google è un modello di IA progettato per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 115 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 97/100 e

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Gemini 4 Argon is 2.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 68 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.1% vs 81.9%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureClaude Opus 5Gemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7597
Provider
AnthropicGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$5.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$25.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$3.85 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
68 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
83.1%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
80.5%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5
+1.2% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 4 Argon
2.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+69% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Opus 5Gemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

83.1%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

80.5%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

90.6%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1485ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

17.2%vs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

51.8%vs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

68 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Claude Opus 51.50s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Claude Opus 58.85s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Claude Opus 5 Monthly API Bill
$30.75 / month
$5/1M in · $25/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon saves approximately $18.60 / month (60%) under this workload.2.5x Savings

Claude Opus 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 83.1% · GPQA Diamond 80.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 68 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1500 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($5/$25 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 1M token (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 115 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 850 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$10 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricClaude Opus 5Gemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$5.49$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
72K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
37K36K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureClaude Opus 5Gemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)claude-opus-5-20260701models/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-072026-09
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2026June 2026
ArchitectureThinking-First Autonomous Foundation ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP ConnectorsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety EvaluatedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 75 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 68 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 4 Argon has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.50s.

Verdetto

Choose Claude Opus 5 for ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi rag aziendali e integrazioni api scalabili., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for ideale per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, sistemi rag aziendali e integrazioni api scalabili..

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Claude Opus 5 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Claude Opus 5 supports 1M tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Anthropic & Google Official Documentation