Llama 4 Behemoth vs Llama 5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Llama 4 Behemoth by Meta and Llama 5 by Meta represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, costs are matched. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Llama 4 Behemoth provides an expanded memory horizon with 10,000K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Llama 5 leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Changez et Comparez les Modèles
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Llama 4 Behemoth
Géant open source de 2Tde Meta gargantuan 2-billions paramètre ouvert modèle pushing le de pointe d'ouvert-weight capacité et 10M contexte.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
10M tokens
75%
Llama 5
Auto-amélioration récursivede Meta phare ouvert modèle intégrant natif agent training, recursive self-improvement, et 5M token contexte.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
5M tokens
74%
Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window (10M vs 5M tokens).
- Llama 5 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.
- Llama 4 Behemoth leads on SWE-bench coding (75.0% vs 74.0%).
| Caractéristique | Llama 4 Behemoth | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 93 | 94 |
Provider | Meta | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 10M tokens~15,000 A4 pages of text | 5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 64K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 45 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 75% | 74% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 82% | 84% |
Qui gagne où ?
At-a-glance decision frameworkScores de Benchmarks Vérifiés
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latence et Temps de Réponse
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Llama 4 Behemoth · Strengths & Key Advantages
- sans égal 2T paramètre ouvert capacité
- Staggering ~10 millions token contexte horizon
- d'avant-garde codage et raisonnement scores
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Demands élevé-end datacenter multinœud GPU clusters (8x H100 minimum)
- Slow inférence débit par rapport à smaller modèles
Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 5 millions token contexte avec natif multi-audio/vidéo compréhension
- Boucle d'entraînement à auto-amélioration récursive
- Completely à poids ouverts avec d'entreprise commercial license
Considerations & Trade-offs
- complexe MoE hébergement requirements
- Les modifications du tokeniseur 4B nécessitent la mise à jour des environnements d'ajustement existants
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Llama 4 Behemoth | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 35K | 40K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 15K | 20K |
Spécifications Techniques
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Caractéristique | Llama 4 Behemoth | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | meta-llama/Llama-4-Behemoth | meta-llama/Llama-5 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | January 2026 |
| Architecture | Colossal sparse MoE architecture (288B active / 2T total, 16-of-2 MoE) | Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) |
| Parameters | 2T total / 288B active (16-of-2 MoE) | 600B+ total (~40-80B active) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1240 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4300 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, video, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Llama 4 Behemoth vs Llama 5: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Llama 4 Behemoth or Llama 5?
Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Llama 5 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Llama 5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 4 Behemoth has a larger context window, supporting 10M tokens compared with 5M tokens.
Verdict
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Llama 4 Behemoth if your priority is National laboratories, large enterprise AI clusters, and extreme scientific modeling. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Llama 5 if your workflow prioritizes Autonomous open-source multi-agent systems, deep software refactoring, and frontier research. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Questions fréquentes
How does Llama 4 Behemoth compare to Llama 5 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Both Llama 4 Behemoth and Llama 5 are open-weights foundation models available at $0.00 direct API cost when self-hosted, or offered at identical baseline rates across major inference providers. Model selection depends on GPU deployment sizing and specialized benchmark performance rather than raw token price.
Which model has a larger context window: Llama 4 Behemoth or Llama 5?+
Llama 4 Behemoth supports a context window of 10,000K tokens (~7,500k words), while Llama 5 supports 5,000K tokens (~3,750k words). Therefore, Llama 4 Behemoth can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Llama 4 Behemoth or Llama 5?+
Llama 4 Behemoth scores 75% on SWE-bench Verified while Llama 5 scores 74%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Llama 4 Behemoth holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Llama 4 Behemoth and Llama 5?+
Llama 4 Behemoth features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Llama 5 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Llama 4 Behemoth and Llama 5?+
Llama 4 Behemoth generates approximately 45 tokens per second, while Llama 5 delivers 65 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Llama 5 provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Llama 4 Behemoth and Llama 5 to optimize costs?+
Yes! Tiered multi-model routing can optimize for latency and accuracy: you can route high-frequency conversational turns and latency-sensitive queries to Llama 5, and route deep architectural or complex reasoning queries to Llama 4 Behemoth. This balanced routing strategy maximizes system throughput and answer quality.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- GPT-OSS 120B vs Llama 5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Llama 4 Behemoth vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Llama 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Llama 5 vs GPT-6 Astra: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
- Llama 5 vs Kimi K3: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparer
Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.
Sources: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs