Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-5 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Vérifié par l’équipe de recherche de GetInfoUsDernière révision : October 2026Politique éditoriale
Partager
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5.1 Chat by OpenAI and GPT-5 Pro by OpenAI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, GPT-5.1 Chat holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GPT-5.1 Chat is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, GPT-5 Pro provides an expanded memory horizon with 400K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-5.1 Chat leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.

Comparaison Face-à-Face (VS)

Changez et Comparez les Modèles

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Chat

Conversationnel 5.1

Un GPT-5.1 optimisé pour le chat pour une assistance raffinée, la rédaction et les conversations produit.

Intelligence Index60 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

OpenAI

GPT-5 Pro

GPT-5 à raisonnement maximal

le élevé-compute GPT-5 palier pour difficult analyse, code revue et planning.

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$120.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

78.5%

Différences Clés en un Coup d’Œil

  • GPT-5.1 Chat is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5 Pro has a larger context window (400K vs 128K tokens).
  • GPT-5.1 Chat is faster at 132 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
  • GPT-5 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (78.5% vs 74.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaractéristiqueGPT-5.1 ChatGPT-5 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6062
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$15.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$120.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$16.05 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K272K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
132 tok/s55 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
74%78.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
71.8%87.2%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$1.50 / 1M

Qui gagne où ?

At-a-glance decision framework
Code
GPT-5 Pro
+4.5% SWE-bench lead
Coût
GPT-5.1 Chat
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Vitesse
GPT-5.1 Chat
+140% faster generation
Contexte
GPT-5 Pro
400K tokens window

Scores de Benchmarks Vérifiés

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.1 ChatGPT-5 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

74%vs78.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

71.8%vs87.2%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86%vs88%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1367ptsvs1374pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

12%vs14%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

46%vs51.5%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

43%vs47%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

71.5%vs74.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

91%vs96%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

77.8%vs82.5%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

132 tok/s vs55 tok/s

Latence et Temps de Réponse

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.1 Chat1.18s
GPT-5 Pro4.20s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.1 Chat4.97s
GPT-5 Pro13.29s

Simulateur Interactif de Coût de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.1 Chat Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
GPT-5 Pro Monthly API Bill
$132.75 / month
$15/1M in · $120/1M out
GPT-5.1 Chat saves approximately $132.75 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-5.1 Chat · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Qualité conversationnelle améliorée par rapport à GPT-5 Chat
  • Bien optimisé pour la rédaction et les flux de travail produit
  • Très performant pour l'édition multitour de documents longs
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Aucune tarification API autonome — accès par abonnement uniquement
  • Fenêtre de contexte plus petite que celle du niveau API

GPT-5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • le plus élevé précision et profondeur dans le GPT-5 family
  • très grand 272K sortie économique pour long deliverables
  • Excellent pour reviewing grand codebases et plans
  • très solide sur long, interdependent planning problems
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Extremely expensive à $15 / $120 par 1M tokens
  • Slow responses — unsuitable pour interactif chat

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.1 ChatGPT-5 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$1.48$20.40
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
52K72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
28K48K

Spécifications Techniques

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaractéristiqueGPT-5.1 ChatGPT-5 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-1-chatgpt-5-pro
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-112025-10
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2024September 2024
ArchitectureChat-tuned unified reasoning modelMaximum-compute unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Flat rate ($15/1M in) across full 400K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix caching at $1.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function callingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.1 Chat vs GPT-5 Pro: Réponses Rapides (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.1 Chat or GPT-5 Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 62 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.1 Chat is faster, generating 132 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.1 Chat is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $16.05 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5.1 Chat has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.18s compared with 4.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 400K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Verdict

Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose GPT-5.1 Chat if your priority is Interactive ChatGPT experiences. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose GPT-5 Pro if your workflow prioritizes High-value, low-volume analysis and code review. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.

Questions fréquentes

How does GPT-5.1 Chat compare to GPT-5 Pro in API token pricing and cost per token?+

GPT-5.1 Chat costs $0.00 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas GPT-5 Pro costs $15.00 input and $120.00 output. Overall, GPT-5.1 Chat is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.

Which model has a larger context window: GPT-5.1 Chat or GPT-5 Pro?+

GPT-5.1 Chat supports a context window of 128K tokens (~96k words), while GPT-5 Pro supports 400K tokens (~300k words). Therefore, GPT-5 Pro can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.

Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: GPT-5.1 Chat or GPT-5 Pro?+

GPT-5.1 Chat scores 74% on SWE-bench Verified while GPT-5 Pro scores 78.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, GPT-5 Pro holds the verified benchmark lead.

What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between GPT-5.1 Chat and GPT-5 Pro?+

GPT-5.1 Chat features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, GPT-5 Pro provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.

How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between GPT-5.1 Chat and GPT-5 Pro?+

GPT-5.1 Chat generates approximately 132 tokens per second, while GPT-5 Pro delivers 55 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-5.1 Chat provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.

Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining GPT-5.1 Chat and GPT-5 Pro to optimize costs?+

Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to GPT-5.1 Chat to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to GPT-5 Pro. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Les scores de benchmarks, tarifs par token et limites évoluent rapidement. Vérifiez toujours les spécifications actuelles sur la documentation officielle du fournisseur.

Sources: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs