Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Pixtral 12B vs Mistral Large 2

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Pixtral 12B vs Mistral Large 2: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Pixtral 12B de Mistral AI y Mistral Large 2 de Mistral AI compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Pixtral 12B ofrece una ventana de contexto de 128K tokens a $0.15/$0.15 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Mistral Large 2 ofrece 128K tokens de contexto a $2.00/$6.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Pixtral 12B

IA Multimodal Nativa

Pixtral 12B de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para comprensión multimodal nativa de texto e imagen y análisis visual de documentos, con ventana de contexto de 128K, velocidad de 85 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 40/100 y tarifa

Intelligence Index40 / 100
Input Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

28%

Mistral AI

Mistral Large 2

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Mistral Large 2 de Mistral AI es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 128K, velocidad de 75 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 46/10

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

38%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Pixtral 12B is 22.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Pixtral 12B is faster at 85 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Mistral Large 2 leads on SWE-bench coding (38.0% vs 28.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaPixtral 12BMistral Large 2
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4046
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.15 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.15 / 1M$6.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.08 / 1M$1.70 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
85 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
28%38%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
43.8%54%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$1.00 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Mistral Large 2
+10.0% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Pixtral 12B
22.8x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Pixtral 12B
+13% faster generation
Contexto
Tied
128K tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Pixtral 12BMistral Large 2
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

28%vs38%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

43.8%vs54%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

67.5%vs76.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1225ptsvs1282pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

24%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

48%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

65%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

85 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Pixtral 12B0.45s
Mistral Large 20.52s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Pixtral 12B6.33s
Mistral Large 27.19s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Pixtral 12B Monthly API Bill
$0.43 / month
$0.15/1M in · $0.15/1M out
Mistral Large 2 Monthly API Bill
$9.90 / month
$2/1M in · $6/1M out
Pixtral 12B saves approximately $9.46 / month (96%) under this workload.22.8x Savings

Pixtral 12B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 128K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 28% · GPQA Diamond 43.8%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 85 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 450 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (12B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Mistral Large 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 128K con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 38% · GPQA Diamond 54%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 75 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 520 ms
  • Pesos abiertos (123B) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricPixtral 12BMistral Large 2
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.09$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaPixtral 12BMistral Large 2
Official API Model ID (SDK)pixtral-12b-latestmistral-large-2-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-092024-07
Knowledge CutoffAugust 2024July 2024
ArchitectureMultimodal Vision-Language Transformer123B Dense Frontier Transformer
Parameters12B123B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokensCached input at $1/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 7 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 26 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 264 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Pixtral 12B vs Mistral Large 2: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Pixtral 12B or Mistral Large 2?

Mistral Large 2 is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 40 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Pixtral 12B is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Pixtral 12B is cheaper at $0.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Pixtral 12B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.45s compared with 0.52s.

Veredicto

Tanto Pixtral 12B (Ideal para comprensión multimodal nativa de texto e imagen y análisis visual de documentos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Mistral Large 2 (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Mistral Large 2 lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Pixtral 12B ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Pixtral 12B resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Pixtral 12B o Mistral Large 2?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Mistral Large 2 obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Pixtral 12B frente a Mistral Large 2?+

Pixtral 12B cuesta $0.15 / $0.15 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Mistral Large 2 cuesta $2.00 / $6.00. En costo combinado, Pixtral 12B es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Pixtral 12B cuenta con 128K tokens de contexto frente a 128K tokens de Mistral Large 2. En velocidad de inferencia, Pixtral 12B ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Mistral AI y Mistral AI, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).