Head-to-Head Model Comparison

o3-pro vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
o3-pro vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning): Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

o3-pro de OpenAI y Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) de xAI compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. o3-pro ofrece una ventana de contexto de 200K tokens a $20.00/$80.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) ofrece 1M tokens de contexto a $3.00/$15.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

o3-pro

Motor de Razonamiento Profundo

o3-pro de OpenAI es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, con ventana de contexto de 200K, velocidad de 30 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 58/100 y tarifa

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$80.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

71.5%

xAI

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

Motor de Razonamiento Profundo

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) de xAI es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 68/100

Intelligence Index68 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

68.2%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is 5.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is faster at 95 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
  • o3-pro leads on SWE-bench coding (71.5% vs 68.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
Característicao3-proGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5868
Provider
OpenAIxAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$20.00 / 1M$3.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$80.00 / 1M$15.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$15.50 / 1M$2.63 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
100K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
30 tok/s95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
71.5%68.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
79.5%72.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$5.00 / 1M$0.75 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
o3-pro
+3.3% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
5.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
+217% faster generation
Contexto
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
1M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

o3-proGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

71.5%vs68.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

79.5%vs72.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs84.1%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1352ptsvs1395pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13.6%vs11.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

47.5%vs44.5%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

45.5%vs41.2%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs66.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93%vs86.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80.5%vs89.2%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

30 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
o3-pro5.20s
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)0.98s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
o3-pro21.87s
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)6.24s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
o3-pro Monthly API Bill
$109.50 / month
$20/1M in · $80/1M out
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) Monthly API Bill
$19.13 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) saves approximately $90.38 / month (83%) under this workload.5.7x Savings

o3-pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 200K con hasta 100K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 71.5% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 30 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 5200 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($20/$80 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 66K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 68.2% · GPQA Diamond 72.8%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 95 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 980 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($3/$15 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metrico3-proGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$11.68$1.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
58K45K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
38K28K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Característicao3-proGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Official API Model ID (SDK)o3-progrok-4-20-reasoning-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2025-062026-03
Knowledge CutoffJune 2024November 2025
ArchitectureHigh-effort reasoning transformerColossus-Scale Reasoning Sparse MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($20/1M in) across full 200K windowFlat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Cached input at $0.75/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedxAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

o3-pro vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning): Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, o3-pro or Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is more intelligent. It scores 68 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is cheaper at $2.63 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $15.50 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.98s compared with 5.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto o3-pro (Ideal para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (Ideal para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, o3-pro o Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de o3-pro frente a Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?+

o3-pro cuesta $20.00 / $80.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) cuesta $3.00 / $15.00. En costo combinado, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

o3-pro cuenta con 200K tokens de contexto frente a 1M tokens de Grok 4.20 (Reasoning). En velocidad de inferencia, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de OpenAI y xAI, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).