Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-5 Pro de OpenAI y Claude Opus 5 de Anthropic compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. GPT-5 Pro ofrece una ventana de contexto de 400K tokens a $15.00/$120.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Claude Opus 5 ofrece 1M tokens de contexto a $5.00/$25.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5 Pro

Motor de Razonamiento Profundo

GPT-5 Pro de OpenAI es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, con ventana de contexto de 400K, velocidad de 55 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 62/100 y tari

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$120.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

78.5%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5

Modelo Insignia de Frontera

Claude Opus 5 de Anthropic es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 68 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 75/100 y tari

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.1%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Claude Opus 5 is 4.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5 has a larger context window (1M vs 400K tokens).
  • Claude Opus 5 is faster at 68 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.1% vs 78.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaGPT-5 ProClaude Opus 5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6275
Provider
OpenAIAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$15.00 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$120.00 / 1M$25.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$16.05 / 1M$3.85 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
272K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
55 tok/s68 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
78.5%83.1%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
87.2%80.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$1.50 / 1M$0.50 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Claude Opus 5
+4.6% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Claude Opus 5
4.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Claude Opus 5
+24% faster generation
Contexto
Claude Opus 5
1M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5 ProClaude Opus 5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

78.5%vs83.1%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

87.2%vs80.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88%vs90.6%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1374ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

14%vs17.2%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

51.5%vs51.8%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

47%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

74.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

96%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

82.5%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs68 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5 Pro4.20s
Claude Opus 51.50s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5 Pro13.29s
Claude Opus 58.85s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5 Pro Monthly API Bill
$132.75 / month
$15/1M in · $120/1M out
Claude Opus 5 Monthly API Bill
$30.75 / month
$5/1M in · $25/1M out
Claude Opus 5 saves approximately $102.00 / month (77%) under this workload.4.3x Savings

GPT-5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 400K con hasta 272K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 78.5% · GPQA Diamond 87.2%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 55 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 4200 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($15/$120 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Claude Opus 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 128K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 83.1% · GPQA Diamond 80.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 68 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 1500 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($5/$25 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5 ProClaude Opus 5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$20.40$5.49
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
72K72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
48K37K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaGPT-5 ProClaude Opus 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-proclaude-opus-5-20260701
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-102026-07
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2024March 2026
ArchitectureMaximum-compute unified reasoning modelThinking-First Autonomous Foundation Architecture
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($15/1M in) across full 400K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $1.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5 Pro or Claude Opus 5?

Claude Opus 5 is more intelligent. It scores 75 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Opus 5 is faster, generating 68 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Claude Opus 5 is cheaper at $3.85 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $16.05 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Opus 5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.50s compared with 4.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 400K tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto GPT-5 Pro (Ideal para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Claude Opus 5 (Ideal para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Claude Opus 5 lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Claude Opus 5 ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Claude Opus 5 resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, GPT-5 Pro o Claude Opus 5?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Claude Opus 5 obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de GPT-5 Pro frente a Claude Opus 5?+

GPT-5 Pro cuesta $15.00 / $120.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Claude Opus 5 cuesta $5.00 / $25.00. En costo combinado, Claude Opus 5 es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

GPT-5 Pro cuenta con 400K tokens de contexto frente a 1M tokens de Claude Opus 5. En velocidad de inferencia, Claude Opus 5 ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de OpenAI y Anthropic, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).