Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial
Compartir
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro de Google y Gemini 2.0 Pro de Google compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Gemini 2.5 Pro ofrece una ventana de contexto de 1.05M tokens a $1.25/$10.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Gemini 2.0 Pro ofrece 2M tokens de contexto a $1.25/$5.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.

Comparación Directa (VS)

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Motor de Razonamiento Profundo

Gemini 2.5 Pro de Google es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, con ventana de contexto de 1.0M, velocidad de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 78/100 y

Intelligence Index78 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

63.8%

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro

Modelo Insignia de Frontera

Gemini 2.0 Pro de Google es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, con ventana de contexto de 2M, velocidad de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 52/100 y tarifa

Intelligence Index52 / 100
Input Token:

$1.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

63.8%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

  • Gemini 2.0 Pro is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 2.0 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 2.0 Pro is faster at 95 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
  • Gemini 2.0 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (63.8% vs 63.8%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
CaracterísticaGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7852
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.25 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$0.97 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
95 tok/s95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
63.8%63.8%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
84%71.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.31 / 1M$0.31 / 1M

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework
Código
Gemini 2.0 Pro
+0.0% SWE-bench lead
Costo
Gemini 2.0 Pro
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Velocidad
Gemini 2.0 Pro
+0% faster generation
Contexto
Gemini 2.0 Pro
2M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

63.8%vs63.8%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

84%vs71.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs79.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1420ptsvs1330pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs11.4%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs42.1%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs38.3%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs65.6%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92%vs82.2%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs71.8%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

95 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro0.82s
Gemini 2.0 Pro0.62s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 2.5 Pro6.08s
Gemini 2.0 Pro5.88s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 2.5 Pro Monthly API Bill
$11.34 / month
$1.25/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemini 2.0 Pro Monthly API Bill
$6.84 / month
$1.25/1M in · $5/1M out
Gemini 2.0 Pro saves approximately $4.50 / month (40%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Gemini 2.5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 1.0M con hasta 66K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 63.8% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 95 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 820 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($1.25/$10 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Gemini 2.0 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Ventana de contexto de 2M con hasta 8K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 63.8% · GPQA Diamond 71.5%)
  • Rendimiento ágil de 95 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 620 ms
  • Economía de API competitiva ($1.25/$5 por 1M de tokens) con soporte para caché de prompts y salidas JSON estructuradas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo propietario en la nube; no permite descargar los pesos para ejecución local sin conexión
  • En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$1.45$1.59
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
45K60K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
22K33K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

CaracterísticaGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-2-5-promodels/gemini-2-pro
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2025-032025-02
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025January 2025
ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with ThinkingMultimodal Deep Reasoning Sparse MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 52 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.97 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 2.0 Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 0.82s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 2.0 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1.05M tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Gemini 2.5 Pro (Ideal para razonamiento lógico profundo, matemáticas avanzadas y resolución científica paso a paso, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Gemini 2.0 Pro (Ideal para razonamiento empresarial de frontera, programación avanzada y flujos de producción, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Gemini 2.5 Pro lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Gemini 2.5 Pro ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Gemini 2.0 Pro resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Gemini 2.5 Pro o Gemini 2.0 Pro?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Gemini 2.5 Pro obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Gemini 2.5 Pro frente a Gemini 2.0 Pro?+

Gemini 2.5 Pro cuesta $1.25 / $10.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Gemini 2.0 Pro cuesta $1.25 / $5.00. En costo combinado, Gemini 2.0 Pro es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Gemini 2.5 Pro cuenta con 1.05M tokens de contexto frente a 2M tokens de Gemini 2.0 Pro. En velocidad de inferencia, Gemini 2.5 Pro ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.

Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Google y Google, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).