Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5 Chat
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic and GPT-5 Chat by OpenAI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, GPT-5 Chat holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GPT-5 Chat is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Claude Haiku 4.5 provides an expanded memory horizon with 200K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, both models deliver balanced throughput and low time-to-first-token latency for interactive conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Vía rápidade Anthropic económico potencia de late 2025, ofreciendo sub-second primer-token latencia, nativo razonamiento modo, y 64K salida capacidad un ultra-bajo prices.
$1.00 / 1M
$5.00 / 1M
200K tokens
58.2%
GPT-5 Chat
GPT-5 conversacionalun chat-tuned GPT-5 optimised para conversación, writing y herramienta flujos de trabajo en ChatGPT.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
70%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- GPT-5 Chat is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window (200K vs 128K tokens).
- GPT-5 Chat is faster at 140 tok/s vs 140 tok/s.
- GPT-5 Chat leads on SWE-bench coding (70.0% vs 58.2%).
| Característica | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-5 Chat |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 54 | 56 |
Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.77 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 64K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 140 tok/s | 140 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 58.2% | 70% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 62.1% | 79% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.10 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPuntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude Haiku 4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Superb velocidad (140 tokens/sec) y ultra-responsive 280ms tiempo-un-primer-token
- Aggressive prompt cache precios ($0.10/M tokens) enabling ultra-cheap continuous monitoring
- primer Haiku nivel un incorporate nativo razonamiento modo y 64K maximum salida tokens
Considerations & Trade-offs
- menor rendimiento en complejo multi-repositorio refactorización que Sonnet y Opus
- Struggles con highly ambiguous matemático proofs
GPT-5 Chat · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Smooth, well-calibrated conversacional tono
- Optimised para el ChatGPT product experience
- Well calibrated refusals y seguridad behaviour
Considerations & Trade-offs
- no offered as un estándar API modelo — subscription access solo
- Smaller contexto y salida limits que el API GPT-5 nivel
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-5 Chat |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.70 | $1.50 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 20K | 54K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 10K | 28K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-5 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | gpt-5-chat |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2025-10 | 2025-08 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | July 2025 | September 2024 |
| Architecture | Lightweight High-Speed Multimodal Transformer | Chat-tuned unified reasoning model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $0.1/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5 Chat: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5 Chat?
GPT-5 Chat is more intelligent. It scores 56 compared with 54 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-5 Chat is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.77 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.28s compared with 1.05s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window, supporting 200K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Veredicto
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if your priority is High-volume customer interaction bots, real-time code autocomplete, log triage, and document routing. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose GPT-5 Chat if your workflow prioritizes Interactive chat and writing inside ChatGPT. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Preguntas frecuentes
How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to GPT-5 Chat in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per 1M input tokens and $5.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas GPT-5 Chat costs $0.00 input and $0.00 output. Overall, GPT-5 Chat is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5 Chat?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports a context window of 200K tokens (~150k words), while GPT-5 Chat supports 128K tokens (~96k words). Therefore, Claude Haiku 4.5 can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5 Chat?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 58.2% on SWE-bench Verified while GPT-5 Chat scores 70%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, GPT-5 Chat holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5 Chat?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, GPT-5 Chat provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5 Chat?+
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5 Chat deliver matching throughput at approximately 140 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, streaming response velocity is comparable, with real-world time-to-first-token (TTFT) determined primarily by provider routing and concurrency load.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5 Chat to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to GPT-5 Chat to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Claude Haiku 4.5. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- GPT-5 Chat vs o3-pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- GPT-5 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- GPT-5 nano vs Claude Haiku 4.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- GPT-5 nano vs GPT-5 Chat: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonComparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs