Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Llama 3 (70B)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien
Teilen
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mixtral 8x22B vs Llama 3 (70B): Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mixtral 8x22B von Mistral AI und Llama 3 (70B) von Meta gehören zu den führenden KI-Modellen. Mixtral 8x22B bietet ein Kontextfenster von 65.5K Tokens bei API-Preisen von $1.20/$1.20 pro 1M Tokens, während Llama 3 (70B) 8.2K Tokens Kontext zu $0.35/$0.80 pro 1M Tokens bereitstellt. Hier finden Sie den vollständigen Benchmark-, Latenz- und Kostenvergleich.

Direktvergleich (VS)

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mixtral 8x22B

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Mixtral 8x22B von Mistral AI ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 66K Kontextfenster, 55 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 44/100 und $1.2/$1.2 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

65.5K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

36%

Meta

Llama 3 (70B)

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Llama 3 (70B) von Meta ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 8K Kontextfenster, 110 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 42/100 und $0.35/$0.8 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index42 / 100
Input Token:

$0.35 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

8.2K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

24%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

  • Llama 3 (70B) is 2.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mixtral 8x22B has a larger context window (66K vs 8K tokens).
  • Llama 3 (70B) is faster at 110 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
  • Mixtral 8x22B leads on SWE-bench coding (36.0% vs 24.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMixtral 8x22BLlama 3 (70B)
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4442
Provider
Mistral AIMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.20 / 1M$0.35 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.20 / 1M$0.80 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.78 / 1M$0.21 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
65.5K tokens~98 A4 pages of text8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
55 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
36%24%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
51.2%46%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.60 / 1M$0.09 / 1M

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Mixtral 8x22B
+12.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 3 (70B)
2.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Llama 3 (70B)
+100% faster generation
Context
Mixtral 8x22B
65.5K tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mixtral 8x22BLlama 3 (70B)
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

36%vs24%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

51.2%vs46%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs72%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1260ptsvs1245pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

31%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

62%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mixtral 8x22B0.70s
Llama 3 (70B)0.42s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mixtral 8x22B9.79s
Llama 3 (70B)4.97s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mixtral 8x22B Monthly API Bill
$3.78 / month
$1.2/1M in · $1.2/1M out
Llama 3 (70B) Monthly API Bill
$1.38 / month
$0.35/1M in · $0.8/1M out
Llama 3 (70B) saves approximately $2.40 / month (64%) under this workload.2.7x Savings

Mixtral 8x22B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 66K Kontextfenster und bis zu 8K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 36% · GPQA Diamond 51.2%)
  • Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 55 Token/Sekunde bei nur 700 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
  • Offene Modellgewichte (141B total (39B MoE)) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
  • Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Llama 3 (70B) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 8K Kontextfenster und bis zu 4K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 24% · GPQA Diamond 46%)
  • Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 110 Token/Sekunde bei nur 420 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
  • Offene Modellgewichte (70B) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
  • Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMixtral 8x22BLlama 3 (70B)
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.45$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMixtral 8x22BLlama 3 (70B)
Official API Model ID (SDK)mixtral-8x22b-latestmeta-llama/Llama-3-(70B)
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-042024-04
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2024March 2024
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (8x22B)GQA High-Capacity Transformer
Parameters141B total (39B active MoE)70B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.2/1M in) across full 66K windowFlat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 8K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.6/1M tokensCached input at $0.0875/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 303 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mixtral 8x22B vs Llama 3 (70B): Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mixtral 8x22B or Llama 3 (70B)?

Mixtral 8x22B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 42 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 3 (70B) is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3 (70B) is cheaper at $0.21 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.78 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3 (70B) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.42s compared with 0.70s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mixtral 8x22B has a larger context window, supporting 65.5K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.

Fazit

Sowohl Mixtral 8x22B (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Llama 3 (70B) (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Mixtral 8x22B führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Llama 3 (70B) liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Llama 3 (70B) ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Mixtral 8x22B oder Llama 3 (70B)?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Mixtral 8x22B vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Mixtral 8x22B und Llama 3 (70B)?+

Mixtral 8x22B kostet $1.20 / $1.20 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Llama 3 (70B) liegt bei $0.35 / $0.80. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Llama 3 (70B) günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Mixtral 8x22B bietet 65.5K Tokens Kontext gegenüber 8.2K Tokens bei Llama 3 (70B). Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Llama 3 (70B) vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Offizielle Quellen: Offizielle API-Dokumentation von Mistral AI und Meta, Systemkarten und unabhängige Benchmark-Auswertungen (2026).