Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri

Paylaş

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GPT-5.4 nanoProfile

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

OpenAI

GPT-5.4 nano

Hafif ve Ekonomik Model

OpenAI tarafından geliştirilen GPT-5.4 nano; token başına maksimum maliyet verimliliği ve hızlı üretim çıkarımı için tasarlanmış olup 400K bağlam penceresi, 235 token/sn hız, 45/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $0.1/$0.8 fiyatlandırma su

Intelligence Index45 / 100

Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

48%

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Hafif ve Ekonomik Model

Google tarafından geliştirilen Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite; token başına maksimum maliyet verimliliği ve hızlı üretim çıkarımı için tasarlanmış olup 1.0M bağlam penceresi, 250 token/sn hız, 60/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $0.15/$0.6 fiyatl

Intelligence Index60 / 100

Input Token:

$0.15 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a larger context window (1M vs 400K tokens).
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is faster at 250 tok/s vs 235 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GPT-5.4 nano	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	45	60
Provider	OpenAI	Google
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.10 / 1M	$0.15 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.80 / 1M	$0.60 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.11 / 1M	$0.11 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text	1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	33K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	235 tok/s	250 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	48%	N/A
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	61.5%	N/A
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.01 / 1M	$0.04 / 1M

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

1.1x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

+6% faster generation

Context

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

1.05M tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.4 nanoGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

48%vsN/A

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

61.5%vsN/A

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.8%vs78.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1310ptsvs1355pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

8.6%vsN/A

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

26%vsN/A

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

28%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

51.5%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

78%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

66.5%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

235 tok/s vs250 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GPT-5.4 nano0.40s

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite0.27s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GPT-5.4 nano2.53s

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite2.27s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GPT-5.4 nano Monthly API Bill

$0.89 / month

$0.1/1M in · $0.8/1M out

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Monthly API Bill

$0.82 / month

$0.15/1M in · $0.6/1M out

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite saves approximately $0.07 / month (8%) under this workload.1.1x Savings

GPT-5.4 nano · Strengths & Key Advantages

400K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 128K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 48% · GPQA Diamond 61.5%)
Sadece 400 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 235 token yüksek üretim hızı
İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $0.1/$0.8 fiyatlandırma)

Considerations & Trade-offs

Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · Strengths & Key Advantages

1.0M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 33K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (MMLU-Pro 78.5% · Arena Elo 1355)
Sadece 270 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 250 token yüksek üretim hızı
İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $0.15/$0.6 fiyatlandırma)

Considerations & Trade-offs

Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GPT-5.4 nano	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.11	$0.38
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	44K	14K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	19K	5K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GPT-5.4 nano	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Official API Model ID (SDK)	gpt-5-4-nano	models/gemini-3-1-flash-lite
API Protocol	OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1	Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date	2026-03	2026-03
Knowledge Cutoff	August 2025	November 2025
Architecture	Nano agent-ready reasoning model	Compact efficient multimodal transformer
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 400K window	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)	Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.035/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG	Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)	Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published	Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

GPT-5.4 nano vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.4 nano or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is more intelligent. It scores 60 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is faster, generating 250 tokens per second compared with 235 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.27s compared with 0.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 400K tokens.

Sonuç

Hem GPT-5.4 nano (token başına maksimum maliyet verimliliği ve hızlı üretim çıkarımı, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) hem de Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (token başına maksimum maliyet verimliliği ve hızlı üretim çıkarımı, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) güçlü üretim seçenekleridir: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite karmaşık akıl yürütme ve kodlama testlerinde öne çıkarken, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite daha yüksek üretim hızı sağlar; GPT-5.4 nano ise yüksek hacimli API kullanımlarında daha ekonomiktir.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Kodlama ve akıl yürütme için GPT-5.4 nano mi yoksa Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite mi daha iyi?+

Bileşik zeka endeksi ve yazılım testlerinde Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite önde yer alıyor. Detaylı karşılaştırma için yukarıdaki SWE-bench ve GPQA tablolarına göz atabilirsiniz.

GPT-5.4 nano ve Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite API fiyatları nasıl karşılaştırılır?+

GPT-5.4 nano 1M giriş/çıkış tokeni başına $0.10 / $0.80 ücretlendirilirken, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite $0.15 / $0.60 seviyesindedir. Karma maliyette GPT-5.4 nano daha avantajlıdır.

Hangi modelin bağlam penceresi daha geniş ve hızı daha yüksek?+

GPT-5.4 nano 400K token bağlam penceresi sunarken Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 1.05M token kapasiteye sahiptir. Saniyedeki token üretim hızında ise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite öndedir.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GPT-5.4 nano vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

GPT-5.4 nano

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

GPT-5.4 nano · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Teknik Özellikler

GPT-5.4 nano vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Sonuç

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Related reading