QwQ 32B Preview vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
QwQ 32B Preview by Alibaba and Qwen2.5-VL 72B by Alibaba represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Qwen2.5-VL 72B holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Qwen2.5-VL 72B is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Qwen2.5-VL 72B provides an expanded memory horizon with 131K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
QwQ 32B Preview
Открытые веса (Open Weights)QwQ 32B Preview от Alibaba — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 32K токенов и стоимостью API $0.2/1M входящих и $0.6/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.
$0.20 / 1M
$0.60 / 1M
32.8K tokens
54.2%
Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Открытые веса (Open Weights)Qwen2.5-VL 72B от Alibaba — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 131K токенов и стоимостью API $0/1M входящих и $0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
38%
Ключевые отличия кратко
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B has a larger context window (131K vs 33K tokens).
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B is faster at 55 tok/s vs 52 tok/s.
- QwQ 32B Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (54.2% vs 38.0%).
| Feature | QwQ 32B Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 47 | 79 |
Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.60 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.14 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 52 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 54.2% | 38% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 65.2% | 58% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Кто лидирует в каждой категории?
At-a-glance decision frameworkРезультаты проверенных бенчмарков
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Задержка и скорость ответа
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
QwQ 32B Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Современная архитектура Reinforcement Learning Reasoning Transformer от Alibaba с поддержкой до 32K токенов контекста
- Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0.2/1M вход, $0.6/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
- Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
- При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
- Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов
Qwen2.5-VL 72B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Современная архитектура Open-Weights Multimodal Vision-Language Transformer от Alibaba с поддержкой до 131K токенов контекста
- Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0/1M вход, $0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
- Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
- При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
- Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | QwQ 32B Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.45 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 22K | 20K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 18K | 6K |
Технические характеристики
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | QwQ 32B Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwq-32b-instruct | qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2024-11 | 2024-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2024 | June 2024 |
| Architecture | Reinforcement Learning Reasoning Transformer | Open-Weights Multimodal Vision-Language Transformer |
| Parameters | 32B | 72B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 33K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.05/1M tokens | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 45 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 155 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
QwQ 32B Preview vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, QwQ 32B Preview or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B is more intelligent. It scores 79 compared with 47 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B is faster, generating 55 tokens per second compared with 52 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.14 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.72s compared with 0.82s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.
Вердикт
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose QwQ 32B Preview if your priority is Olympiad math proofs, algorithmic puzzles, complex logic deductions, and benchmark verification. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Qwen2.5-VL 72B if your workflow prioritizes Self-hosted visual intelligence, private document parsing, and research benchmarks. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)
How does QwQ 32B Preview compare to Qwen2.5-VL 72B in API token pricing and cost per token?+
QwQ 32B Preview costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens, whereas Qwen2.5-VL 72B costs $0.00 input and $0.00 output. Overall, Qwen2.5-VL 72B is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: QwQ 32B Preview or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?+
QwQ 32B Preview supports a context window of 33K tokens (~25k words), while Qwen2.5-VL 72B supports 131K tokens (~98k words). Therefore, Qwen2.5-VL 72B can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: QwQ 32B Preview or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?+
QwQ 32B Preview scores 54.2% on SWE-bench Verified while Qwen2.5-VL 72B scores 38%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, QwQ 32B Preview holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between QwQ 32B Preview and Qwen2.5-VL 72B?+
QwQ 32B Preview features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Qwen2.5-VL 72B provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between QwQ 32B Preview and Qwen2.5-VL 72B?+
QwQ 32B Preview generates approximately 52 tokens per second, while Qwen2.5-VL 72B delivers 55 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Qwen2.5-VL 72B provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining QwQ 32B Preview and Qwen2.5-VL 72B to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Qwen2.5-VL 72B to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to QwQ 32B Preview. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B vs QwQ 32B Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonСравнение
- Phi-4 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonСравнение
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs QwQ 32B Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonСравнение
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonСравнение
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonСравнение
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonСравнение
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Официальные источники: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs