Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Проверено исследовательской группой GetInfoUsПоследняя проверка: October 2026Редакционная политика
Поделиться
Related topics (4)
AlibabaOpenAIopen-sourceflagship

Compare Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct by Alibaba against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Прямое сравнение (VS)

Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Открытые веса (Open Weights)

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct от Alibaba — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 262K токенов и стоимостью API $0/1M входящих и $0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index86 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

56.5%

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

Модель глубокого рассуждения

GPT-6.1 Sol от OpenAI — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 1M токенов и стоимостью API $2.0/1M входящих и $10.0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

Ключевые отличия кратко

  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 52 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 56.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8694
Provider
AlibabaOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
52 tok/s120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
56.5%82.3%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
70%80.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Кто лидирует в каждой категории?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+25.8% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6.1 Sol
+131% faster generation
Context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1M tokens window

Результаты проверенных бенчмарков

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

56.5%vs82.3%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

70%vs80.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1355ptsvs1519pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.1%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs63.6%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs54.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs79.7%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs93.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs91%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

52 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Задержка и скорость ответа

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct0.76s
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct10.38s
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s

Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct saves approximately $12.15 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Code-Specialized Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer от Alibaba с поддержкой до 262K токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0/1M вход, $0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Near-Astra unified reasoning model от OpenAI с поддержкой до 1M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($2.0/1M вход, $10.0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$2.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K62K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
9K36K

Технические характеристики

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instructgpt-6-1-sol
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-042026-09
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2025April 2026
ArchitectureCode-Specialized Sparse Mixture-of-Experts TransformerNear-Astra unified reasoning model
Parameters480B total (35B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 298 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1032 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 86 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 52 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.76s compared with 1.12s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Вердикт

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе alibaba, or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе openai.

Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Официальные источники: Alibaba & OpenAI Official Documentation