Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Проверено исследовательской группой GetInfoUsПоследняя проверка: October 2026Редакционная политика
Поделиться
Related topics (4)
AlibabaGoogleopen-sourceflagship

Compare Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct by Alibaba against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Прямое сравнение (VS)

Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Открытые веса (Open Weights)

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct от Alibaba — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 262K токенов и стоимостью API $0/1M входящих и $0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index86 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

56.5%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Модель глубокого рассуждения

Gemini 4 Argon от Google — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 1M токенов и стоимостью API $2/1M входящих и $10/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Ключевые отличия кратко

  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 52 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 56.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8697
Provider
AlibabaGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
52 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
56.5%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
70%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Кто лидирует в каждой категории?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+25.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+121% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

Результаты проверенных бенчмарков

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

56.5%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

70%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1355ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

52 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Задержка и скорость ответа

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct0.76s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct10.38s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct saves approximately $12.15 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Code-Specialized Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer от Alibaba с поддержкой до 262K токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0/1M вход, $0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts от Google с поддержкой до 1M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($2/1M вход, $10/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
9K36K

Технические характеристики

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instructmodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2025-042026-09
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2025June 2026
ArchitectureCode-Specialized Sparse Mixture-of-Experts TransformerPathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters480B total (35B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 298 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1032 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Gemini 4 Argon: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 86 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 52 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.76s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Вердикт

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе alibaba, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе google.

Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Официальные источники: Alibaba & Google Official Documentation