Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-6 Astra

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Проверено исследовательской группой GetInfoUsПоследняя проверка: October 2026Редакционная политика
Поделиться
Related topics (4)
NVIDIAOpenAIopen-sourceflagship

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B by NVIDIA against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Прямое сравнение (VS)

Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Открытые веса (Open Weights)

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B от NVIDIA — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 262K токенов и стоимостью API $0.1/1M входящих и $0.25/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index45 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

38%

OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra

Модель глубокого рассуждения

GPT-6 Astra от OpenAI — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 1M токенов и стоимостью API $10.0/1M входящих и $50.0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index96 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

272K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.4%

Ключевые отличия кратко

  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 151.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 262K tokens).
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is faster at 130 tok/s vs 100 tok/s.
  • GPT-6 Astra leads on SWE-bench coding (82.4% vs 38.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-6 Astra
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4596
Provider
NVIDIAOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.25 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.06 / 1M$7.70 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
130 tok/s100 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
38%82.4%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
54%80.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$1.00 / 1M

Кто лидирует в каждой категории?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6 Astra
+44.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
151.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
+30% faster generation
Context
GPT-6 Astra
272K tokens window

Результаты проверенных бенчмарков

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-6 Astra
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

38%vs82.4%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

54%vs80.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1285ptsvs1520pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.2%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

34%vs63.8%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs54.9%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs79.8%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

64%vs93.6%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

76%vs91.2%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

130 tok/s vs100 tok/s

Задержка и скорость ответа

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B0.32s
GPT-6 Astra0.95s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B4.17s
GPT-6 Astra5.95s

Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Monthly API Bill
$0.41 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out
GPT-6 Astra Monthly API Bill
$61.50 / month
$10/1M in · $50/1M out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves approximately $61.09 / month (99%) under this workload.151.9x Savings

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (30B Total / 3B Active) от NVIDIA с поддержкой до 262K токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0.1/1M вход, $0.25/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT от OpenAI с поддержкой до 1M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($10.0/1M вход, $50.0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-6 Astra
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.12$2.15
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
28K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
10K32K

Технические характеристики

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-6 Astra
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3bgpt-6-astra
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-122026-09
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2025June 2026
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts (30B Total / 3B Active)Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT
Parameters30B (3B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 262K windowFlat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.02/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext, audio

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-6 Astra: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 100 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.06 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.32s compared with 0.95s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Вердикт

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе nvidia, or choose GPT-6 Astra for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе openai.

Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or GPT-6 Astra?+

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.1/1M input and $0.25/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or GPT-6 Astra?+

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B supports 262K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Официальные источники: NVIDIA & OpenAI Official Documentation