Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Проверено исследовательской группой GetInfoUsПоследняя проверка: October 2026Редакционная политика
Поделиться
Related topics (4)
GoogleGoogleopen-sourceflagship

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Прямое сравнение (VS)

Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Открытые веса (Open Weights)

Gemma 4 26B A4B от Google — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 262K токенов и стоимостью API $0/1M входящих и $0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index74 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

61%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Модель глубокого рассуждения

Gemini 4 Argon от Google — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 1M токенов и стоимостью API $2/1M входящих и $10/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Ключевые отличия кратко

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 160 tok/s vs 115 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 61.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemma 4 26B A4BGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7497
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
160 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
61%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
71.5%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Кто лидирует в каждой категории?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+20.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemma 4 26B A4B
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemma 4 26B A4B
+39% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

Результаты проверенных бенчмарков

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemma 4 26B A4BGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

61%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

71.5%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

80.5%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1365ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

160 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Задержка и скорость ответа

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemma 4 26B A4B0.29s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemma 4 26B A4B3.42s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemma 4 26B A4B Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemma 4 26B A4B saves approximately $12.15 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Gemma 4 26B A4B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Sparse Mixture-of-Experts open transformer (26B total, 4B active) от Google с поддержкой до 262K токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0/1M вход, $0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts от Google с поддержкой до 1M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($2/1M вход, $10/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4BGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
8K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
3K36K

Технические характеристики

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemma 4 26B A4BGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemma-4-26b-a4bmodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-042026-09
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026June 2026
ArchitectureSparse Mixture-of-Experts open transformer (26B total, 4B active)Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters26B (4B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 16 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 56 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 4 Argon: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 74 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 115 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemma 4 26B A4B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.29s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Вердикт

Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе google, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе google.

Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B supports 262K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Официальные источники: Google & Google Official Documentation