Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Проверено исследовательской группой GetInfoUsПоследняя проверка: October 2026Редакционная политика
Поделиться
Related topics (4)
GoogleMetaflagshipopen-source

Compare Gemini 3 Pro by Google against Llama 5 by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Прямое сравнение (VS)

Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Модель глубокого рассуждения

Gemini 3 Pro от Google — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 2M токенов и стоимостью API $2/1M входящих и $12/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.2%

Meta

Llama 5

Открытые веса (Open Weights)

Llama 5 от Meta — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 5M токенов и стоимостью API $0/1M входящих и $0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Ключевые отличия кратко

  • Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 2M tokens).
  • Gemini 3 Pro is faster at 118 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Gemini 3 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (76.2% vs 74.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 3 ProLlama 5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6294
Provider
GoogleMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$12.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.74 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
118 tok/s65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
76.2%74%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
73.5%84%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Кто лидирует в каждой категории?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 3 Pro
+2.2% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 5
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro
+82% faster generation
Context
Llama 5
5M tokens window

Результаты проверенных бенчмарков

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 3 ProLlama 5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

76.2%vs74%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

73.5%vs84%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86.8%vs87%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1384ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

12.9%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

47.9%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

44.8%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs68%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92.8%vs88%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

84.6%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

118 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Задержка и скорость ответа

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 3 Pro1.80s
Llama 50.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 3 Pro6.04s
Llama 58.54s

Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 3 Pro Monthly API Bill
$14.10 / month
$2/1M in · $12/1M out
Llama 5 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Llama 5 saves approximately $14.10 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Gemini 3 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Sparse Multimodal MoE от Google с поддержкой до 2M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($2/1M вход, $12/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) от Meta с поддержкой до 5M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0/1M вход, $0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 3 ProLlama 5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.40$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
60K40K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
31K20K

Технические характеристики

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 3 ProLlama 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-3-prometa-llama/Llama-5
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-112026-04
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025January 2026
ArchitectureSparse Multimodal MoEMixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)
ParametersConfidential600B+ total (~40-80B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.2/1M with configurable TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, video, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 5: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 5?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3 Pro is faster, generating 118 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.74 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 2M tokens.

Вердикт

Choose Gemini 3 Pro for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе google, or choose Llama 5 for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе meta.

Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 5?+

Gemini 3 Pro costs $2/1M input and $12/1M output tokens, while Llama 5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 5?+

Gemini 3 Pro supports 2M tokens whereas Llama 5 supports 5M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Официальные источники: Google & Meta Official Documentation